Jason, all the fixes needed have been made and backported to release-0.9.
Feel free to create RC2!
- Houston
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 1:46 PM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> I've uploaded some "Draft" release notes for 0.9.1; please take a look
> and review if you have a few minutes!
>
>
> https://cwik
I've uploaded some "Draft" release notes for 0.9.1; please take a look
and review if you have a few minutes!
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Solr+Operator+Release+Notes+v0.9.1
Best,
Jason
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 1:32 PM Jason Gerlowski wrote:
>
> Excellent, looks like all of t
Excellent, looks like all of the blockers mentioned last week are
cleared up; will start on the first RC now!
Best,
Jason
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 1:23 PM Houston Putman wrote:
>
> I'm adding https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/761 as a blocker,
> but there is an easy fix! https://git
I'm adding https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/761 as a blocker,
but there is an easy fix! https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/766
- Houston
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:43 AM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> In terms of outstanding blockers I'd like to get a fix in place for
> https:
In terms of outstanding blockers I'd like to get a fix in place for
https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/759 before we build an
RC. It looks like a small syntax error in the bash script run by our
'setup-zk' container. Hoping I can have a fix in the next day or so.
I'm tempted to list
Alright, not hearing any objections so I'll proceed with a 0.9.1 release!
The usual spiel/reminder about our release branch conventions:
I am now preparing for a Solr Operator bugfix release from branch release-0.9
Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
* Before committi
Yes absolutely!
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 10:11 AM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> We've had a handful of GH Issues come in for the operator (most
> clustered around the SOLR-17690 regression), that are pretty big
> problems for folks hoping to adopt Operator 0.9.0. What do we think
> about
Hey all,
We've had a handful of GH Issues come in for the operator (most
clustered around the SOLR-17690 regression), that are pretty big
problems for folks hoping to adopt Operator 0.9.0. What do we think
about doing a bugfix operator release in the next week or two?
Pending any objections - is
