Hi David,
Bain is investigating.
Also, while I work on updating the website: for the Solr users who want
accounts, please ask them to send me an email for which they want an account.
Thanks,
-Uv
On May 16 2025, at 9:11 am, David Smiley wrote:
> FYI the Crave builds run via GHA (PRs) are having
Let me know when you want me to update to JDK 21 on the Crave tests.
Thanks,
-Uv
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 5:59 AM David Smiley wrote:
> +1 to move Solr main to Lucene's version (21) as soon as you wish.
> Like just go for it now if you are motivated. I echo Jan's preference
> to not make "sweepi
end, all data should be available to you already.
>
> Otherwise if you look at older PRs (month+) you'll find other examples
> pretty quickly, here is one I'm working on that seem to have the same
> troubles https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1119
>
> I hope this helps,
Hi Isabelle,
I'm from the Crave team who's trying to figure out the PR patching problem.
I'd like to be able to debug your PR.
I will need to understand what your patch looks like on your machine.
Will you be willing to join a Zoom call where I guide you to run a few git
commands?
This will real
really effective in letting me know when small
> commits have odd side effects. My laptop is older, so I generally can’t
> run the full test suite the way I want, and seeing the list of green checks
> from Crave running the tests is always very encouraging. Looking forward
> to these impr
Sorry for the delay, I had to collect this information from the team.
As you said: Crave doesn't need to know the commit history, it just needs
enough information from git to be able to reproduce the filesystem state on to
the remote side without having to do a full rsync.
We have to account for
olr is cloned. There should
> be no need to try to find a merge base and reapply commits.
>
> [1]
> https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally
>
> Kevin Risden
>
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at
why it failed to apply.
> >
> > Kevin Risden
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 4:33 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> >
> > > Looks like crave test (in github actions) is still somewhat unstable,
> > > sometimes failing to allocate resoources?
> > &
Kinda new here, so this might be a dumb question, but what does it mean to host
a Virtual meetup?
I don't know what I'd be signing up for and if I have what it takes.
On Feb 27 2023, at 6:48 am, Jason Gerlowski wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> As we get towards the end of February it's time to start thinki
r.git"
>
> Where can I get the crave.conf file? Its not available in the solr
> repository
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 9:40 AM Yuvraaj Kelkar wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > If you click the "Apache Solr" button under this link:
> > https://crave.io/#op
Hi David,
If you click the "Apache Solr" button under this link:
https://crave.io/#opensource
(https://link.getmailspring.com/link/9a5d0988-b270-4045-8962-954924dc8...@getmailspring.com/0?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fcrave.io%2F%23opensource&recipient=ZGV2QHNvbHIuYXBhY2hlLm9yZw%3D%3D)
, there's a set
Hi all,
The Crave infrastructure ran out of storage yesterday night (2/13) at 3am
Pacific.
The total disk space available was 250GB and 100% was used up, leading to a
"limp-home" status.
Remedial actions:
Free up storage by purging log files and cache. We're now back at 10%
utilization.
Reboo
up-to-date
>
>
> Build Successful
>
> Total time: 5m25.5s
> --------
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 6:06 PM Eric Pugh
> wrote:
>
Hurray!
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023, 19:27 David Smiley wrote:
> The PR is merged. Henceforth, all java based tests will run on PRs.
> Also "crave run" now has the defaults so you can run that at your terminal
> without adding all the extra args :-)
>
> I did an experiment[1] wondering how long it wou
Hm. I see your point. The first solution I thought of is a bit blunt, but it
will work: We disable command line arguments when using ZeroConf. Only preset
commands are allowed.
Also, to allow the Solr GHA to run whatever commands needed not just for now,
but also for any future changes, we set u
gt;
> > On Jan 26, 2023, at 1:11 AM, Yuvraaj Kelkar wrote:
> >
> > Apologies: I just signed up for this email list right now. I was signed up
> > for the old Lucene list but didn't realize that the split would impact the
> > mailing list as well. Explains a lot,
Apologies: I just signed up for this email list right now. I was signed up for
the old Lucene list but didn't realize that the split would impact the mailing
list as well. Explains a lot, now that I think about it.
I'll answer all the questions here, that I see from the thread:
1: (Noble) Full t
17 matches
Mail list logo
