e team by
> testing issues/fixes/features/etc. on macOS, just let me know and I'd be
> happy to help on my end.
>
> Paul Irwin
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 8:22 AM Robert Muir wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 12:53 PM
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 12:53 PM Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Possibly migrate away from VirtualBOX to KVM, but it's unclear if Hackintoshs
> work there.
>
-device
isa-applesmc,osk="ourhardworkbythesewordsguardedpleasedontsteal(c)AppleComputerInc"
---
o this is a serious bug. In
> Lucene tests we havent seen this!
>
> Uwe
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Robert Muir
> > Sent: Wedn
I also generally tried to "beast" this
SimpleFacetsTest.testRangeFacetFilterVsDocValuesRandom without any
seed at all (JDK 17/linux), but I didn't manage to provoke any
failures.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 1:08 PM Robert Muir wrote:
>
> I checked out the commit hash and re-ran t
ally reproduces failures for
given random seeds?
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 12:44 PM Robert Muir wrote:
>
> Uwe, it looks a little crazy:
>
> we've got asserts here that "index" is in bounds and certainly not -1
> right before the method call!
> https://github.com/apache/
Uwe, it looks a little crazy:
we've got asserts here that "index" is in bounds and certainly not -1
right before the method call!
https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/main/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/Lucene90DocValuesProducer.java#L1123-L1125
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 12:
>> : >
>> : > I have this in my lucene-core-9.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:
>> : >
>> : > Implementation-Version: 9.0.0-SNAPSHOT de45b68c909815ce5ea7b6b9e1a2ce337
>> : > 5b6334d [snapshot build, details omitted]
>> : >
>> : > and running:
>> : >
>> : &
quot;easy in java".
This is *exactly* what i mean when i say this crazy shit has NO
INTEROP. It is 100% pure garbage, java showing its true colors.
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 5:53 AM Robert Muir wrote:
>
> I was referring to doing this with languages other than java.
>
> I'm als
gt; java PrintManifest.java lucene-core-9.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>
> shows:
>
> lucene-core-9.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar: 9.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> de45b68c909815ce5ea7b6b9e1a2ce3375b6334d [snapshot build, details
> omitted]
>
> This seems easier to me than trying to remember and keep the length of
But its irrelevant that is "valid" when virtually no tools match it.
In other words, I'd agree with you if the "jar" command had some
ability to read these manifests and print stuff to stdout, e.g. if
there was ANY interop at all here.
But there isn't. So IMO it makes no sense to cause confusion
+1 for option #1 Let's control the hash to a reasonable size, so that
the version number will "fit"
We would hit this same problem with 10.0.0 and then we'd have to
revisit it again with 10.10.0, so let's not try to solve it
onesy-twosey at this time
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 2:46 PM Mike Drob wro
11 matches
Mail list logo
