I haven’t followed what PRS even is or what its benefits are supposed to
be so can’t comment on whether it should/coud be a default. I may be alone
in that since I haven’t had bandwidth to pay attention to very many recent
Solr changes, but I do note that there is only one entry in the Solr Ref
Gu
You can add yourself via your Apache ID:
https://infra.apache.org/apache-github.html
Go to id.apache.org and update your profile with your Github username. Because
Infra knows you are a committer, that will automatically update your group
after a few hours.
If you’ve done that and it’s not wor
We got those tabs from Bootstrap which had built-in support for them (they’re
called “navs”: https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.6/components/navs/).
Due to the way Antora deals with the UI for a docs site, I did not try to
re-implement the bootstrap framework and all that - it was simpler to try to
One thing we haven’t talked about yet is the Ref Guide for 9.0.
SOLR-1 re-organized the entire guide and changed a lot of page names. At
the time I merged this into the main branch there was a little bit of comment
about trying to provide page redirects for the changed page names but AFAIK n
In 9 that moves to this page:
https://nightlies.apache.org/solr/draft-guides/solr-reference-guide-main/solrcloud-distributed-requests.html#collection-parameter
On Dec 15, 2021, 12:05 PM -0600, Cassandra Targett ,
wrote:
> Are you guys talking about this?
> https://solr.apache.org/guid
Are you guys talking about this?
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_10/solrcloud-query-routing-and-read-tolerance.html#collection-parameter
On Dec 15, 2021, 8:04 AM -0600, Eric Pugh ,
wrote:
> We have a “Expert Feature” concept in the ref guide I believe for these kinds
> of settings! Mikhail, i
Can someone explain why it’s no risk & can’t be exploited? Because it doesn’t
take input?
On Dec 12, 2021, 4:26 PM -0600, Uwe Schindler , wrote:
> +1
>
> I was wondering about this, too. It makes mitigation too complex. There is no
> risk in the exporter script. Just mention this as a single sent
Uwe, I understand Log4J 2.15.0 is going to address the vulnerability, but do
you think we should add the system property 'log4j2.formatMsgNoLookups=true'
anyway, just as a general good practice? I got that impression from reading
your earlier message and wanted to confirm if I was correct.
Even
less effort of
> > > Cassandra of carrying the burden of the ref-guide all these years. It
> > > really is a professional piece of work! Few open source projects are
> > > blessed with such good docs! But it is often a thankless job as well,
> > > especially the w
Ha ha, you actually wanted the 8.11 Ref Guide to be updated for 8.11?
I had a few minutes today to look at the CHANGES for 8.11 and I’d like to
mention a couple of things. I should have time to do this tomorrow so I will
update the page and re-publish.
Cassandra
On Nov 17, 2021, 5:42 AM -0600,
I don’t want to start a fight here but the SIP process [1] doesn’t say anything
about a vote passing by lazy consensus. It offers 2 options, lazy consensus via
no further discussed objections OR a vote that must have 3 binding +1s:
---
5. When feedback iteration trails off on the DISCUSS thread,
AM -0600, ashu , wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> Plase let me do it.
>
> Regards,
> Ashutosh
> > On Wed, 10 Nov 2021, 9:42 pm Cassandra Targett,
> > wrote:
> > > I screwed it up somehow when I pushed the final pages. I’m traveling on
> > > vacation and
I screwed it up somehow when I pushed the final pages. I’m traveling on
vacation and won’t be able to fix it until sometime next week after I catch up
with day job stuff (could easily be 2-3 weeks before I can get to it).
Instructions on how to republish to fix it are in the actual ref guide if
I think there is something wrong with the build of the contrib modules, but
I haven't paid close enough attention to this area to know for sure. I
didn't see any Jira issues that explain this, but didn't have time for a
comprehensive search.
I downloaded
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/S
I have long wanted to spend some time converting the HowToContribute wiki page
to something in the dev-docs directory. I totally forgot about the CONTRIBUTING
file - if that’s a common way of doing this, then I think we should do it, and
move a good chunk of the HowTo info the dev-docs if we can
So basically the proposal would be that we use the embedded ZK to automatically
create a quorum via multiple nodes. That’s an interesting idea.
However, we tell people not to use the embedded ZK in production, so I’m
curious if that’s only because it’s a single-node ZK or if there is something
As such, I'm not sure a CI server is the best way to
> approach this vs a manual script publishing to an ASF personal Home space.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> > On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 10:
I’m sort of surprised no one has mentioned the https://nightlies.apache.org/
server, which could be used for this purpose. Jenkins can push to it, and
nothing gets deleted until we decide to delete it (or overwrite it). Solr
Operator builds go there as do drafts of the Ref Guide pre-publication
in the 8x branch, but I didn't investigate further on
> how they would differ. Was just trying to be helpful and give you a heads up
> about it, but looks like I caused more confusion than help!
>
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:31 PM Cassandra Targett
> > wrote:
> >
I pushed up the URL changes I mentioned.
Not sure what you mean, Mike, by “gradle->ant translation”? The build process
is different in branch_8x but it’s documented in the how-to-contribute page in
the ref guide that talks about contributing and building, etc.
On Mar 29, 2021, 12:55 PM -0500, Mi
You mentioned maybe re-publishing the Ref Guide in one of the issues, do you
still want to do that? If so, I should backport URL changes for the project
split (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15212) - it won’t be a
problem for me to do that before the end of this week.
On Mar 29, 2021
21 matches
Mail list logo
