Re: Solr Dense Vector Dev Group

I'm interested, thanks for the initiative!

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.9 Release

+1 Thanks Houston! Le mer. 11 juin 2025 à 00:29, Jan Høydahl a écrit : > Great plan. +1 > > > 9. juni 2025 kl. 23:14 skrev Houston Putman : > > > > Hey everyone, > > > > It's been a while since the last minor release and the changelog looks > > pretty good to get the next one in. > > > > I volun

Re: Welcome Matthew Biscocho as Solr Committer

Welcome Matt!

Re: Replica recovery fails after using Solr Encryption Plugin in multi-sharded Solr collection

Hi Manish Kumar, Can you open a git issue in the Solr sandbox repo? https://github.com/apache/solr-sandbox/issues What is the replica type? The default NRT? If you can contribute, it would be great to propose a PR with a Solr test reproducing the problem. Thanks, Bruno Le sam. 4 janv. 2025 à 07

Design question about Collection operations

Generally, where should go operations on a Collection? At Collection admin level handler? At Core level handler? There are examples of both. I'm asking the question with the Solr encryption feature in mind (in solr-sandbox). A client may want to encrypt all the indexes for a given Collection. Whic

Re: Welcome Christos Malliaridis as Solr Committer

Welcome! Le ven. 15 nov. 2024 à 03:51, Justin Sweeney a écrit : > Welcome Christos! > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 10:11 AM Michael Gibney > > wrote: > > > Welcome, Christos! > > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 8:30 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) > > wrote: > > > > > > Welcome Christos! >

Re: Getting CorruptIndexException after auto commit after integrating Solr encryption plugin

> > how to set COMMIT_ACTIVE_KEY and COMMIT_KEY_ID or PARAM_KEY_ID in > SolrQueryRequest req dynamically ? > If Keys are set to req object before calling > EncryptionRequestHandler.handleRequestBody(SolrQueryRequest req, > SolrQueryResponse rsp), this module will work. Indeed the EncryptionReques

Re: Re: Getting CorruptIndexException after auto commit after integrating Solr encryption plugin

Could you avoid the "RE: Re:" prefix on the email title so that it's easier to have a single thread mail please? 1- From you solrconfig.xml, I suppose org.apache.solr.encryption.KmsKeySupplierFactory is your custom KeySupplierFactory, right? 2- Are you able to run the encryption tests? Do they pas

Re: Getting CorruptIndexException after auto commit after integrating Solr encryption plugin

Hi Manish, First, a disclaimer about the encryption module in solr-sandbox. It is in sandbox, not integrated (yet) in the Solr project, so there can be some road blocks. That said, I'll try to help. 1- Can you share the encryption-specific parts of your solrconfig.xml file? 2- Can you share the f

Re: Welcome Sanjay Dutt as Solr committer!

Welcome Sanjay! Le mar. 21 mai 2024 à 16:03, Gus Heck a écrit : > Welcome! Congratulations! > > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 4:56 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > > > Welcome on board Sanjay, thrilled to see the community grow. Thanks also > > for introducing yourself and for explaining Open Source to your M

Re: [DISCUSS] Community Virtual Meetup, February 2024

I vote for 2/23 Thanks Jason

Re: BackupRepository changes

Separating the corruption check from the copy would be clean but I think it would be intrusive in the public API, and currently making the check while reading has better performance that I don't want to disturb for edge cases. Making it toggle-able is feasible with the plugin init args. It would be

Re: BackupRepository changes

> Isn't the intent to ensure we don't waste time/space creating a useless backup of something that is, I suppose, already corrupted? That's right. And I didn't read the code enough; a clear effort has been put here since the last time I read the code, to make all implementations consistent to veri

BackupRepository changes

I noticed two points that I propose to change in some BackupRepository implementations and in BackupRepositoryFactory: 1- Two implementations (S3BackupRepository, GCSBackupRepository) compute and verify the checksum of index files being copied. Other implementations do not. => I propose to remove

Re: forbidden-apis + assertThat = insanity

I agree that having to write "MatcherAssert.assertThat" each time is tedious and makes my code ugly. So finally I try to avoid this nice construction. Not satisfying. Le mer. 25 oct. 2023 à 22:44, Kevin Risden a écrit : > It came in as part of > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/947#issuecomme

PR to cleanup VersionBucket for the UpdateLog

Hi All, I have a PR[1] to remove the "highest" field from VersionBucket (highest doc version of the bucket). By reading the code, I understand that this field is used for an optimization in the case of a distributed update and non-leader checking a doc version for an update. But I wondered about t

Re: Apache Solr Newsletter proposal September 2023

+1 ! Le lun. 9 oct. 2023 à 16:54, Eric Pugh a écrit : > I’d love to see it on mastodon/twitterX/linkedin too…. I bet ASF PR > would love to see this as well ;-) > > > On Oct 8, 2023, at 5:36 PM, Alessandro Benedetti > wrote: > > > > +1 I think it's a wonderful idea! > > > > On Sun, 8 Oct 2023

Re: Limiting Backup IO

Nice +1 Le ven. 7 juil. 2023 à 16:07, David Smiley a écrit : > I gave it a look. I like it! > > ~ David > > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 6:22 PM Pierre Salagnac > wrote: > > > Here is my POC to add a queue into CoreAdminHandler: > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1761 > > > > It does the foll

Re: Proposal of an encryption module in solr-sandbox

t; > >> Does it need to be a first party project? > >> > >> On Wed, 15 Mar, 2023, 2:46 pm Bruno Roustant, > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I pushed a PR <https://github.com/apache/solr-sandbox/pull/51>

Proposal of an encryption module in solr-sandbox

Hi, I pushed a PR in solr-sandbox to propose a Java-level encryption for Solr. This work is the follow up of LUCENE-9379 . To give some deta

Re: Google Java Style: shall we declare intent to follow?

+1 I find that a standard is more productive because I wouldn't have to question anymore about what is the consistent naming/pattern to use. Le mar. 7 mars 2023 à 19:05, Anshum Gupta a écrit : > I like the idea, David. Overall it makes for code that is easier to read > and understand, specially

Re: Welcome Andy Webb as Solr committer

Welcome! Le mar. 7 mars 2023 à 21:14, Tomás Fernández Löbbe a écrit : > Welcome Andy! > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:53 AM Gus Heck wrote: > > > Welcome :) > > > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 10:37 AM Michael Gibney < > mich...@michaelgibney.net> > > wrote: > > > > > Welcome, and congrats! > > > > > >

preferredLeader is useless during election or node restart

After many tests and deployments, it appears the preferredLeader flag described in the RebalanceLeader command doc [1] is not useful. It is taken into account only during the rebalance command. Afterwards, if there is a leader election or some node restart, it is ignored. Is this preferredLeader u

Re: Welcome Justin Sweeney as Solr committer

Welcome Justin! Le jeu. 16 févr. 2023 à 18:04, Ilan Ginzburg a écrit : > Welcome Justin! > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 2:53 PM Kevin Risden wrote: > > > Welcome Justin! > > > > Kevin Risden > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 11:58 AM Houston Putman > > wrote: > > > > > Welcome Justin! > > > > >

Re: Welcome Colvin Cowie as Solr committer

Welcome Colvin! Le jeu. 16 févr. 2023 à 18:02, Ilan Ginzburg a écrit : > Congrats and welcome Colvin! > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 1:21 PM Jason Gerlowski > wrote: > > > Welcome Colvin! > > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 2:34 PM Anshum Gupta > > wrote: > > > > > > Congratulations and welcome, Colv

Re: Outreachy

Welcome Joshua! And thanks David for this initiative! Le mar. 6 déc. 2022 à 15:32, David Smiley a écrit : > Welcome Joshua! I'm looking forward to these changes coming to > fruition finally! > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > >

Re: JIT Shard leader design/proposal

I don't know enough how the current leader election mechanism works, yet. I miss a comparison between this proposal and the current mechanism. B. With this proposal, each time we need the leader, we check it. What is the cost of this check? Do we need to read the cluster state each time? C.1.A "S

Re: preferredLeader

It should also be possible to set preferred leaders during shard split. Currently, shard split always keeps the current host as the leader of the sub-shards. And if we split again sub-shards, this can lead to a very unbalanced situation where the same host becomes the leader for a whole set of shar

MoveReplicaCmd with concurrent updates

Hi all, I'm playing with the MoveReplicaCmd. Internally it calls addReplica and then deleteReplica. And it seems that, if there are concurrent updates, the call to deleteReplica makes the concurrent updates fail because they do not find the replica at the original host. Details: The test moves myte

Re: Welcome Markus Jelsma as Solr committer

Welcome Markus! Le mar. 21 juin 2022 à 20:13, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) < cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> a écrit : > Hello everyone. > > On behalf of the Apache Solr PMC, I'm pleased to announce that Markus > Jelsma has accepted the invitation to become a Solr committer. > > Markus - it'

Re: Quarterly Committer Meetings

+1 I'll try to make it, probably with some lateness. Bruno Le jeu. 13 janv. 2022 à 03:34, Shawn Heisey a écrit : > On 1/12/2022 3:46 AM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote: > > +1, the time works for me and I am in! > > > > Do we have a calendar event already? > > Looking forward to seeing a Google Mee

Re: [DISCUSS] Mark Rate Limiting as Experimental for Solr 9.0

+1 It will allow folks to try it (me included?) Bruno Le mer. 12 janv. 2022 à 17:00, Mike Drob a écrit : > Howdy folks, > > After finding two quick bugs in the rate limiting code[1][2], I suspect > that this feature has largely gone untested in our code up until now. I > also looked at TestRequ