Way to go Pierre!
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 11:04 AM Pierre Salagnac
wrote:
> I tried to run smoke tests for 9.9, and they failed several times in a row
> for me because of flaky logging tests. Since we also hit this failure
> frequently in our CI, I spent some time looking at test execution.
>
>
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [0:47:24.327199]
Ran the smoke test and tested out basic indexing and querying. Spent some
time verifying the admin UI as well as read through the changelog and
everything looks good.
Thanks for volunteering for the release, Houston!
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 5:23 PM Houst
I tried to run smoke tests for 9.9, and they failed several times in a row
for me because of flaky logging tests. Since we also hit this failure
frequently in our CI, I spent some time looking at test execution.
I figured out that TestLogWatcher systematically fails when it is executed
after Packa
Brian Proffitt asked me for some words for the hackathon, so I did:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BdoXVCeualopZeRsF5Q-fVA9KB4PG92fg1DPxbwmBDM/edit?tab=t.0
Would love some feedback.
One thing we need is some committers and/or active contributors from various
projects related to search to sho
