Re: New UI (Kotlin) module: maybe separate repo/build but included as dependency?

2025-03-17 Thread Jason Gerlowski
Can someone expand on the downsides of having the Kotlin UI code in the main repo? Or the concrete benefits of separating it out? I know there were some CI job failures around the time of the initial merge, but I haven't noticed it causing issues after that - did I miss some other discussion wher

Re: New UI (Kotlin) module: maybe separate repo/build but included as dependency?

2025-03-17 Thread David Eric Pugh
Yeah, I am a bit suss of having it be in it's own repo.  If it's in it's own repo, folks won't know about it, and it'll struggle to gain traction.   We've gone down the separate repo path with some other efforts, like the Yet Another Solr Admin UI project.   Having it not build on various arc

Re: New UI (Kotlin) module: maybe separate repo/build but included as dependency?

2025-03-17 Thread Houston Putman
Jason, if you look at the policeman jenkins, you will see a lot of failures. (Because of alternate JDK support). You will also see failures for https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Test-main-s390x/ because that architecture isn't supported. There are a few other jenkins failures, but the

[Operator] [VOTE] Release the Solr Operator v0.9.1 RC1

2025-03-17 Thread Jason Gerlowski
Please vote for release candidate 1 for the Solr Operator v0.9.1 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-operator/solr-operator-v0.9.1-RC1-rev099a38bf7716fa645a8fae6ad34b7922ccd5d4ff You can run the full smoke tester, with instructions below. However

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr Operator 0.9.1 Release

2025-03-17 Thread Jason Gerlowski
I've uploaded some "Draft" release notes for 0.9.1; please take a look and review if you have a few minutes! https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Solr+Operator+Release+Notes+v0.9.1 Best, Jason On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 1:32 PM Jason Gerlowski wrote: > > Excellent, looks like all of t

Re: New UI (Kotlin) module: maybe separate repo/build but included as dependency?

2025-03-17 Thread Christos Malliaridis
I was considering this from the beginning, and I was not aware of the whole stack we were using for building Solr. I thought that the GitHub workflows would be sufficient to guarantee at least the build processes to succeed in all our CI/CD environments, but I was wrong. Since the UI is generating

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr Operator 0.9.1 Release

2025-03-17 Thread Jason Gerlowski
Excellent, looks like all of the blockers mentioned last week are cleared up; will start on the first RC now! Best, Jason On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 1:23 PM Houston Putman wrote: > > I'm adding https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/761 as a blocker, > but there is an easy fix! https://git