When we looked at the issue (I’m not looking at the code), it didn’t look
like a lack of CPU problem - it looked like, by default you would get one
thread, I suppose trying to be the same as you’d get previously by default.
Except, you’d now get Lucene’s parallel segment search code path with that
Hi Jude,
I love the data-driven approach here!
Let’s be explicit about the change that brought this about: it’s
multiThreaded=true https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13350
Can you try setting
https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/configuration-guide/configuring-solr-xml.html#indexS
(An aside: discussion around a particular endpoint or even category of
endpoints deserves its own thread IMO)
> On Feb 10, 2025, at 4:40 PM, Christos Malliaridis
> wrote:
> - If this assumption is correct, can one update the log level of all nodes
> with a single request?
I can say Solr suppo
I am very pleased by the progress we achieved in this topic so far, and I would
like to add some input from the consumers' perspective.
With the start of the new Admin UI development (SIP-7), we now have an
additional source for evaluating the v2 API and polish it based on additional
scenarios.
Thanks for your input!
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 2:20 PM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> Hey David,
>
> I think reducing NamedList usage is a great idea, and I'm glad to see
> you interested in tackling that (or at least, shining light on a
> possible path forward).
>
> I'm +1 with the plan itself, but I
Hey David,
I think reducing NamedList usage is a great idea, and I'm glad to see
you interested in tackling that (or at least, shining light on a
possible path forward).
I'm +1 with the plan itself, but I've offered a few suggestions below
that I think could make the writeup clearer on some point
Greetings all,
In the process of following up on this thread in the users mailing list:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/96ndn3n999dxpm71xjcwr4c6bjpd4sdy, we ran the
solr-benchmark project on various local development builds of Solr. For
context, this benchmark (https://github.com/pavel-chumakou
Huge +1
-Jan
> 10. feb. 2025 kl. 04:52 skrev David Smiley :
>
> We don't yet use Java's SPI/ServiceLoader mechanism in Solr *itself* yet we
> benefit from Lucene's embrace of it as seen in our schema (nice short
> names; no more weird class=solr.XXX). I filed a JIRA and a draft PR that
> starts
