Great. Please remember to update the release notes with the list of
contributors using the newly committed
script dev-tools/scripts/parseContributorsFromChanges.py ; it's not yet
integrated into the release wizard. If you'd like, I could do this.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 12:05 PM Anshum Gupta wr
+1 (Binding)
Successfully smoke tested it as well.
- Houston
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 7:14 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Successfully smoke tested the Solr Operator v0.9.0!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for fixing the test script. It could be merged into the release
> branch since it is not affecting r
Thank you everyone for testing the release candidate and voting.
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
+1: 9 (6 binding)
0: 1
-1: 0
This vote has *PASSED*.
-Anshum
Hi,
I want to inform you about a behavior change in SolR 9.6 (Lucene 9.10) vs. SolR
9.7 (Lucene 9.11) for vector searches.
We heavily rely on vector searches for embeddings in combination with filter
queries on the parent documents.
Our queries in general looked like this:
select?q={ knn f=vector
Successfully smoke tested the Solr Operator v0.9.0!
+1 (binding)
Thanks for fixing the test script. It could be merged into the release branch
since it is not affecting released bits but only test script, then others will
have an easier time testing...
Jan
> 21. jan. 2025 kl. 13:21 skrev Jaso
Thanks for trying things out Jan!
I'm not familiar with this bit of smoke-tester code, but at a glance
it looks like the bash script is using a for-loop variable outside the
for-loop. Created a PR
(https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/749) to fix it, if
anyone's got a few minutes to revie
Hi,
I did the kubectl create tests and ended up with a local cluster with v0.9
operator. No issues.
I also tried running smoke tester but it ended with this error:
> Downloaded: 2 files, 2,3K in 0s (84,8 MB/s)
> ./hack/release/smoke_test/verify_all.sh: line 118: artifact: unbound variable
Jan
I think we can reword that v2 line-item to highlight the user value a
little better; instead highlighting that Solr finally offers a way to
list/read clusterprops. I'll take a crack at that...
On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 1:40 AM David Smiley wrote:
>
> I edited most entries, removed a few lines and
