Solr has supported Result Grouping[1] for a long time but has mostly been
duplicative with Collapse & Expand[2]. At the start of the RG docs,
there's this notice which I wrote many (10?) years ago:
> Prefer Collapse & Expand instead
> Solr’s Collapse and Expand Results feature is newer and mostly
Switching BATS should be a new dev list thread. Not saying I'm looking
forward to migrating yet another thing but don't want to cross our
conversations.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 10:19 AM Christos Malliaridis <
c.malliari...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Maybe should be in "bats" actually.
>
> Before addi
Hey all,
The operator has accumulated a nice few bug-fixes and improvements
since our 0.8.1 release back in the Spring. What do we think about
doing an operator release in the coming weeks?
If so, is anyone actively working on things that they'd hope to finish
up before that happens?
Best,
Jas
> Maybe should be in "bats" actually.
Before adding more tests to bats we should probably migrate to an
OS-independent test framework. The missing coverage for Windows is taking
its toll.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 2:29 PM David Smiley wrote:
> Definitely +1 to a smoke test (just look for non-fail
Definitely +1 to a smoke test (just look for non-failure). Maybe a single
test class smoke testing all of v2. Maybe should be in "bats" actually.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 4:24 AM Colvin Cowie
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Okay yep, I can probably raise a JIRA and a PR tomorrow. I checked on 9.7
> and 9.4, bu
Hi,
Okay yep, I can probably raise a JIRA and a PR tomorrow. I checked on 9.7
and 9.4, but looking at the source I expect it's always been this way.
On the testing front, I think it's a good idea to have at least one "smoke"
test on every API just to check that things serialize correctly, even
wit
