If someone wants this in 10x, they should not take it from branch_9x, they
should take it from branch_10x (once it exists) at the point it was
removed. It's been updated for Curator.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 11:02 AM Houston Putman wrote:
> Yeah and the modules are very well self contained now,
Yeah and the modules are very well self contained now, so even easier to
just drip in from the old release. Who knows if itll work with the 10.x
changes, like curator, though.
- Houston
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 8:51 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hey, we even have historic tgz releases with both JAR fi
Hey Jason,
I'm happy to organize this month's meetup. I've created
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/2024-11-20+Meeting+notes -
feel free to add items to the agenda (or send them to me and I can them add
them).
Hope to you see you all next week.
-Andrey
From: dev@solr.apache.or
Hey, we even have historic tgz releases with both JAR files and source code, no
need for git foo either :)
Jan
> 12. nov. 2024 kl. 15:15 skrev Jason Gerlowski :
>
> Yeah, no question that the code can be resurrected with some source
> control magic. And it's in line with our backcompat require
Yeah, no question that the code can be resurrected with some source
control magic. And it's in line with our backcompat requirements, as
long as hadoop-auth remains on branch_9x. But still - "dig the code
up yourself if you want it" might come off as a bit callous to
hadoop-auth users looking to
Thanks to source control history, it's always resurrectable by whomever
cares enough to resurrect it. I don't think we should feel compelled to do
anything more than remove it. If someone cares -- hey go for it. But I
don't think we need a convention/process that includes this.
On Tue, Nov 12,
Hi,
A light weight way to handle this is to mention along with the removal-text in
ref-guide for 10.0 that the code is still available in branch_9x for anyone who
wants to fork it.
Jan
> 12. nov. 2024 kl. 14:30 skrev Jason Gerlowski :
>
> Hey all,
>
> Apologies for chiming in to this a bit l
Hey all,
Apologies for chiming in to this a bit late. I don't have any
objection to the hadoop-auth module moving out of the apache/solr
repo, especially given the excellent due diligence you put in earlier
this year through your survey, in questions to users@ about usage,
etc.
But should we hav
Hey all,
It's time again to start planning this month's community meetup.
We've switched recently to using a "standing" time each month, so
unless anyone objects we'll aim to meet at 9am PT on Wednesday
November 20th.
The main thing to discuss then is whether we have any volunteers to
organize an
