>
>
> The topic about the Jetty blockers is probably worth its own thread, but
> to respond to Gus message: Jetty 10 may be a version we could work with,
> but it could mess up any ongoing work on updating Jetty.
Solr 9.x is already depending on Jetty 10. (and Solr uses javax classes
with it curr
Thanks for the responses David, this helps me to improve the documentation for
this process. I am proceeding with the dependency updates and so far it seems
most of the time to be straight forward, with a question popping up every now
and then. The only challenge so far has been the identificati
Never failed before, however from the past two days it's been in a flaky
state.
at org.apache.zookeeper.KeeperException.create(KeeperException.java:125)
~[zookeeper-3.9.2.jar:3.9.2]
at org.apache.zookeeper.KeeperException.create(KeeperException.java:53)
~[zookeeper-3.9.2.jar:3.9.2]
at org.apache.z
Thanks for the heads up, James!
I haven't been able to reproduce TestLBHttp2SolrClient, unfortunately.
Looking at the historical failure rates it has been flaky for some
time - which assuages my concerns about a "new bug" a good bit. IMO it
needn't be resolved prior to 9.7.1. (Though I intend to k
Jason, you may want to know that PR #2828 (to be merged to main soon)
will rename TestLBHttp2SolrClient to LBHttp2SolrClientIntegrationTest.
I did not look into why it fails sometimes, but I have a feeling it is
because it relies on Thread.sleep and clock time.
On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 1:46 PM Jason
