Really hoping to get https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2593 and
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2577 in for 9.7 as well.
I’ve asked on the user mailing list for help testing the changes out on
Windows, so hopefully we get some confirmation the work I’ve done is bug free
and it won’t hold
(face-palm) -- you were very clear but I misread it; sorry Andrey!
I agree with what you propose / imply: code should *not* call submit()
if it ignores the returned Future; it misses the point of the submit
method! execute() should be used in that case. In fact I recently
proposed this very impr
I hadn't realized it wasn't marked for 9.7 but
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17298 was always intended as a
blocker as well.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 12:31 PM Anshum Gupta
wrote:
> Sure, I'll wait until the 30th. Thanks for letting me know.
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 9:39 PM Ishan C
: Yes, JDK 9 changed the default provider to be the compat one, but Java 21
: should already default to the CLDR. But maybe theres a difference in parsing.
Mmmm, I think you're mistaken somewhere ... jdk9, jdk11, jdk17, and jdk21
all say the default behavior is the same...
>> The default order
Sure, I'll wait until the 30th. Thanks for letting me know.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 9:39 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Anshum,
> I'm still working on unblocking SOLR-13350. Can we please push the date
> back by a week, say 30 July?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Isha
Hi David,
In the example of SolrZkClient.ProcessWatchWithExecutor#process, it should
be possible to use ExecutorService#submit and ExecutorService#execute
methods interchangeably - because either method would run the task in the
background. So I went ahead and replaced `submit` with `execute`, and
