Curious, did you generate the list of people to think with
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2424 ?
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 2:10 PM Houston Putman wrote:
>
> Release notes can be found here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNote9_6_1
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 12:55 PM
Hi Francisco,
KMW Technology provides commercial support for Solr 8.11.x and we
maintain a custom build that fixes many of these CVEs. Let me know if you
are interested and we can share some more details.
Best,
-Kevin
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 6:52 AM Francisco Jose Mulero
wrote:
> Hi
>
> The
Nevermind, had issues logging in but got in and fixed that.
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 10:47 AM Anshum Gupta
wrote:
> Thanks Houston.
>
> The CHANGES.txt link on that doc points to Solr 9.6.0.
>
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 11:10 AM Houston Putman
> wrote:
>
>> Release notes can be found here:
>> h
Thanks Houston.
The CHANGES.txt link on that doc points to Solr 9.6.0.
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 11:10 AM Houston Putman wrote:
> Release notes can be found here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNote9_6_1
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 12:55 PM Houston Putman
> wrote:
>
>
+1 (binding)
Smoke-tester passed and tested some basic indexing/search.
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 12:39 PM Houston Putman wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.6.1
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.6.1-RC1-rev-d7f716
+1 (binding)
Ran the smoketester and did a few manual backup/restore and installshard tests.
Best,
Jason
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 4:18 AM Arrieta, Alejandro
wrote:
>
> +1 not binding
>
> SUCCESS! [0:38:34.087315]
>
> Dockers
> [+] Building 45.1s (10/10) FINISHED
> [+] Building 28.5s (10/10) FIN
We need a complete path for scaling from the smallest Solr set ups to the
largest that is well supported by the community, and this seems to be key to
supporting the largest deployments. So this make sense to me.
Would saying that this kind of change is targeting Solr 10 take some of the
pres
I think of this from time to time. To get some progress, should be first agree
in this thread that it is a decent idea, and that a new Solr module is
warranted for this?
I'd hate to see good initatives like this to he held up by arguments not
related to the code itself but to the lifecycle or w
+1 not binding
SUCCESS! [0:38:34.087315]
Dockers
[+] Building 45.1s (10/10) FINISHED
[+] Building 28.5s (10/10) FINISHED
Kind regards,
Alejandro Arrieta
On Mon, May 27, 2024, 2:58 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:45:03.659058]
>
> -Jan
>
> > 23. mai 2024 kl. 21:39 skrev Houston Putm
