Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.6 release

2024-04-15 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> We can give another week to cut the RC. That's probably a good idea anyway. Thanks > There's danger in pushing something big in at the last moment. Fully agree. For me, I just want to get a reasonably contained Tika change in. On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 00:19, Gus Heck wrote: > We can give anothe

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.6 release

2024-04-15 Thread Gus Heck
We can give another week to cut the RC. That's probably a good idea anyway. But the point of a branch is to allow people to keep working on things they don't think should go in. There's danger in pushing something big in at the last moment. For example I might or might not push in SOLR-17151 (I'm o

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.6 release

2024-04-15 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya
Indeed, quite a few PRs are almost ready. Can we push the feature freeze by a week, please? On Fri, 12 Apr, 2024, 8:45 pm David Smiley, wrote: > We do have a lot of PRs that appear to be in an advanced state of > readiness. Maybe some have been reviewed by local search teams even > albeit not p

Re: solr query alerting

2024-04-15 Thread Luke Kot-Zaniewski (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A)
Hey David, Just wanted to bump this. I appreciate you taking a look, and wanted to stress that I am looking for even just higher level feedback at this point. Basically, I am questioning the direction I am going in which involves exposing some of the lucene-monitor internals (so currently have