Hi Christine,
I have experience in Angular too, I can take care of this.
Best,
Vincenzo
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 7:22 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <
cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Are you curious about the code behind the Solr Admin UI, generally or the
> dashbo
Hi all,
I’d like to draw your attention to SOLR-17138. Jira description gives a more
detailed background of the issue - but in short, Solr lacks a robust way to
limit the resource usage (be it CPU time or memory consumption or other
resource) on a per-query basis. CircuitBreakers help to an ext
It's probably cleanest to create a new ticket of type="bug", and then link
back to SOLR-16879 - that way the "Fix Version" field can be unambiguous.
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 1:33 PM Pierre Salagnac
wrote:
> Thanks for your input.
> Unfortunately there is no parameter for that. This is hardcoded at
Thanks for your input.
Unfortunately there is no parameter for that. This is hardcoded at 5.
Yes, I'm already working on a fix.
Sorry to hijack this thread for the 9.5 release... Is a new Jira required
for such an issue?
I'm unclear with this, since the regression was introduced in a version
that
Hi Everyone,
Are you curious about the code behind the Solr Admin UI, generally or the
dashboard specifically?
https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/getting-started/solr-admin-ui.html#dashboard
And/Or have you ever found yourself staring at a Java commandline for quite a
while?
If so then
Interesting - 9.4 has been out there since October, I'm surprised no one
reported this earlier. But I guess there's always a lag for teams to
upgrade to new versions...
Is the number of "expensive" tasks configurable, such that there's a
workaround for collections with many shards? Assuming not,
The regression was introduced in 9.4.
Le lun. 5 févr. 2024 à 18:31, Pierre Salagnac a
écrit :
> Hi Jason,
>
> A regression was introduced in backup/restore for large collections. This
> was reported in a comment of SOLR-16879[1].
> Should this be considered as a blocker for 9.5 ?
>
> [1]
> https
Hi Jason,
A regression was introduced in backup/restore for large collections. This
was reported in a comment of SOLR-16879[1].
Should this be considered as a blocker for 9.5 ?
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16879?focusedCommentId=17813066&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.iss
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.5.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.5.0-RC1-rev-1fb7d127fc064b0bab8435a431d71a44050e654b
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.
