Re: Overseer, expiring queued messages

2024-02-02 Thread Ilan Ginzburg
A cluster wide timeout makes sense and is simpler if it is only used by the Overseer (or whatever entity processes a request) to decide not to start processing (that delay would not be request specific but depends on the load put by other concurrent activity in the cluster). If we consider a timeou

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.11.3

2024-02-02 Thread Houston Putman
Ok, so I pulled your recent commit that explicitly disabled PRS and it passed. I wonder why the "-Duse.perreplica" flag is not working. Anyways, if you are ok with this being a pretty bad bug for PRS collections, then we can move forward with the release. - Houston On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 7:18 AM

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0

2024-02-02 Thread Jason Gerlowski
Alright looks like the last blocker has been merged - I'll start on the RC this morning! On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 8:57 AM Jason Gerlowski wrote: > Alright - everything looks pretty good on the Lucene 9.9.2 upgrade front. > > We still have one "blocker" for cutting 9.5 RC1 - SOLR-17068. It looks >

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.11.3

2024-02-02 Thread Noble Paul
I'm running it as follows ant test -Dtestcase=CloudAuthStreamTest -Dtests.seed=F8952559841D5C83 -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=sk -Dtests.timezone=Atlantic/Bermuda -Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8 -Duse.perreplica=false On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 12:17 AM Noble

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.11.3

2024-02-02 Thread Noble Paul
are you sure you are able to make the test fail with the seed ? Can you please confirm it On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 4:29 AM Houston Putman wrote: > > Any news Noble? > > I'm not comfortable moving forward without a fix for this, and we really do > need to get an 8.11.3 out there soon. > > - Houston