Re: Overseer, expiring queued messages

2024-02-01 Thread David Smiley
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 1:53 PM Ilan Ginzburg wrote: > > I'd be in favor of the Overseer dropping synchronous requests for which the > requestor is no longer waiting (ephemeral ZK node is gone). I agree! As you know, we've customized Solr to do exactly that for collection creation. We suspect a

Re: Overseer, expiring queued messages

2024-02-01 Thread Ilan Ginzburg
I'd be in favor of the Overseer dropping synchronous requests for which the requestor is no longer waiting (ephemeral ZK node is gone). For sync or async requests, we could let the caller set a timeout after which the processing should not start if it hasn't already, or for async messages allow a c

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.11.3

2024-02-01 Thread Houston Putman
Any news Noble? I'm not comfortable moving forward without a fix for this, and we really do need to get an 8.11.3 out there soon. - Houston On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 12:27 PM Noble Paul wrote: > I beasted this test a few 100 times and it was not failing. I shall > try this again (with the seed)

Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Smoketest-9.5 - Build # 7 - Still Failing!

2024-02-01 Thread David Smiley
I commented on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17089 CC Jason On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 9:12 AM Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > > Build: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Smoketest-9.5/7/ > > Log: > Started by timer > Running as SYSTEM > [EnvInject] - Loading node environment

Re: BackupRepository changes

2024-02-01 Thread Bruno Roustant
Separating the corruption check from the copy would be clean but I think it would be intrusive in the public API, and currently making the check while reading has better performance that I don't want to disturb for edge cases. Making it toggle-able is feasible with the plugin init args. It would be

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0

2024-02-01 Thread Jason Gerlowski
Alright - everything looks pretty good on the Lucene 9.9.2 upgrade front. We still have one "blocker" for cutting 9.5 RC1 - SOLR-17068. It looks like there's an approved PR for that ticket ( https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2227) but I know there's been some discussion of the overall approach