Re: [DISCUSS] SIP-20: Separation of Compute and Storage in SolrCloud

2024-01-22 Thread Ilan Ginzburg
I have created a Jira, the branch with the current code and documentation and updated the SIP-20 page: Jira: SOLR-17125 Branch: jira/solr-

Re: [DISCUSS] SIP-20: Separation of Compute and Storage in SolrCloud

2024-01-22 Thread Ilan Ginzburg
> > To clarify - since you mentioned durability, I'm assuming the commit that > happens on each update batch is a "hard commit"? > Yes. If the user made an explicit hard-commit or had an autoCommit configured, > would that be a no-op for ZERO collections? > Yes. > How do soft-commits behave - I

Re: [DISCUSS] SIP-20: Separation of Compute and Storage in SolrCloud

2024-01-22 Thread Jason Gerlowski
Thanks for the detailed response! I've got a few follow-ups that I'll ask in line, but I think I've got the core idea now, thanks! > With the implementation in its current state, an indexing batch (as sent > by the client) is processed by the leader replica, committed to local disk > then written

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0

2024-01-22 Thread Eric Pugh
Should it be an error? > On Jan 22, 2024, at 2:35 PM, Jason Gerlowski wrote: > >> I'm a little surprised that this isn't caught by the > 'check'/'precommit' checks - I've been relying (apparently mistakenly) on > those tasks to catch this sort of thing when reviewing and merging PRs. > > Ah, I

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0

2024-01-22 Thread Jason Gerlowski
> I'm a little surprised that this isn't caught by the 'check'/'precommit' checks - I've been relying (apparently mistakenly) on those tasks to catch this sort of thing when reviewing and merging PRs. Ah, I see why I didn't catch it. It's a warning instead of an error. Nevermind my comment. Work

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0

2024-01-22 Thread Jason Gerlowski
I've put together a first-draft for our release-notes for 9.5. They're available here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/DRAFT+ReleaseNote9_5_0 Would love some review on what I've put together; feel free to add, remove or change anything as needed! Best, Jason On Mon, Jan 22, 20

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0

2024-01-22 Thread Jason Gerlowski
> I committed a bug in the build for setting up Node with a registry mirror. I assume it's ok for me to backport? Yep, please do! > One page has two of the same anchors on branch_9x and branch_9_5. We should fix this before the release. Agreed, I'll take a look. Fwiw, I merged the PR that like

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0

2024-01-22 Thread Houston Putman
Hey Jason, I committed a bug in the build for setting up Node with a registry mirror. I assume it's ok for me to backport? Also I noticed that there is an issue with the ref guide. One page has two of the same anchors on branch_9x and branch_9_5. We should fix this before the release. {"level":"

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.5 Release

2024-01-22 Thread Jason Gerlowski
Hey all, You've likely seen the "New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0" email, but in case you haven't: branch_9_5 is now created and "feature freeze" for it is currently in effect. There are no 9.5 blockers afaik, so my plan is to leave a few days for any lingering bugs folks might want

New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0

2024-01-22 Thread Jason Gerlowski
NOTICE: Branch branch_9_5 has been cut and versions updated to 9.6 on the stable branch. Please observe the normal rules: * No new features may be committed to the branch. * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be committed to the branch. However, you should submit al

Re: Protected-Branches Maintenance on Release

2024-01-22 Thread Jason Gerlowski
Relatedly, there's a PR here to update the file on 'main': https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2211 On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 11:08 AM Jason Gerlowski wrote: > Hey all, > > I noticed some instructions in the releaseWizard that seemed a little > "off" around how protected branches are updated. Par

Protected-Branches Maintenance on Release

2024-01-22 Thread Jason Gerlowski
Hey all, I noticed some instructions in the releaseWizard that seemed a little "off" around how protected branches are updated. Particularly, it looks like the wizard has RMs update ".asf.yaml" on the new release branch (e.g. branch_9_5), instead of 'main'. (The relevant wizard code is here: htt

Re: failing: not ok 3 auth enable/disable lifecycle in 10000ms

2024-01-22 Thread Eric Pugh
Build https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/168/ has been running for five days! Guessing it's not going to finish. I clicked the "Stop" button on the build and will see what happens. I might let it run another time to see if the test starts behaving, and if not, then remo