+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [0:51:47.471576]
I also successfully built both Docker images and ran the Solr Operator
integration tests with the full image:
Will run 23 of 23 specs
Running in parallel across 3 processes
•••
Ran 23 of 23 Specs in 433.438 seconds
SUCCESS! -- 23 Passed
> Is there an urgent need for this release?
Have I seemed "urgent"? I suggested a mid-January 9.5 back on 12/6 (see
the "9.4.1 release" thread). If anything I've been slow :-p
Like I said in my initial message here - my motivation around 9.5 is just
that I think there's some cool stuff lined up
Since the 9.4.1 release candidate is out, I'm fine waiting for it to
finish. But let's try to get 8.11.3 out very soon afterwards.
Also, as I stated on the other thread, didn't mean to tread on your toes
here. If you want to continue with the release, please do!
- Houston
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at
Apple isn't urging anything, and you really can assume that's true across
the board for our decisions.
There are other concerns that are urging quick releases (See other mailing
lists for more information).
I'm happy to let you continue the 8.11.3 release, and if you want to wait
for 9.4.1 that i
Is there an urgent need for this release?
I saw that Houston took over the 8.11.3 release process from me without any
prior intimation. Is Apple asking both of you to hurry up?
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 20:35, Jason Gerlowski wrote:
> > but let 9.4.1 get out the door first..
>
> I'm happy to wait i
Still thinking through Jan's question; haven't made up my mind on a
preference (A, B, C, D, etc.) yet. But had a few questions/reactions,
inline.
> My arguments for this approach: 1) Solr has 16993 JIRA issues!
> 2) There are 4030 OPEN issues, of which 3681 has not been
> touched for a year! Why
Hi Christine, I can try it.
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:39 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <
cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Two issues of incorrect quoting in the bin/solr script have been
> identified - would you be interested in contributing to fix them?
>
> Pleas
> but let 9.4.1 get out the door first..
I'm happy to wait if that's the consensus, but is there a reason one
release needs to block another?
I could be blanking, but I don't think there's any technical conflict in
terms of where artifacts are staged, etc. is there?
> getting through some one-ti
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [0:33:05.648738]
Kevin Risden
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 3:34 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [0:42:51.792486]
>
> Also built docker container and spun up the server locally.
>
>
> PS: Need to remove extra newline between the two lines of command when
> co
Nearby there's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17112 as well;
rather trivial
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 6:57 AM Vincenzo D'Amore wrote:
> Hi Christine, I can try it.
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:39 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <
> cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi
Hi Everyone,
Two issues of incorrect quoting in the bin/solr script have been identified -
would you be interested in contributing to fix them?
Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17074 for details.
Thanks,
Christine
>> collection.configName
> Where is this used as a system property override? I looked and don't see
> it.
Yea, this should not have been in the list. Removed
> "enabled" vs "disabled": can we standardize on "enabled"?
That would have been nice. I think typically .enabled is used when default is
12 matches
Mail list logo
