I just reread my message and it was confusing. by "tomorrow morning" I mean
"I will give it another 24h starting now(ish)".
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 10:35 AM Alex Deparvu wrote:
> Hi.
> Sorry, I should have made that clearer. I am planning the first RC for
> tomorrow morning.
>
> > Are bug fixes s
Hi.
Sorry, I should have made that clearer. I am planning the first RC for
tomorrow morning.
> Are bug fixes still allowed into the release branch until then?
Not really sure, maybe others can chime in? my guess is this can go in if
it is a blocker.
best,
alex
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Is
Can you please suggest when you're planning to spin the first RC? Are bug
fixes still allowed into the release branch until then?
On Wed, 4 Oct, 2023, 9:58 pm Alex Deparvu, wrote:
> Quick update, we are blocker free. Both issues have been resolved and as
> far as I can see there is no pending is
Quick update, we are blocker free. Both issues have been resolved and as
far as I can see there is no pending issue for 9.4 anymore.
best
alex
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:45 PM Walter Underwood
wrote:
> I think this is missing a some words:
>
> "A new Always-On trace id generator and the rid para
> often the reason we are grabbing JSON from some random URL is because we
> don’t have SolrJ support for that specific API
I know of some tests that intentionally _don't_ use SolrJ because
they're trying to validate some aspect of the form of the API. i.e.
The test isn't validating the API func
The code snippet you included is the main one I've seen (in
SolrCloudTestCase-derived classes at least). It's fairly simple with
just that one line, though I imagine most of the complexity comes in
with making sure created clients have a corresponding auth setup...
Was that (i.e. client creation)
