Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.1 RC1

In my opinion, these two are blockers. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16776 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16777 In case we decide not to respin to accommodate these, these should be carried over to a 9.2.2 release. On Sat, 29 Apr, 2023, 7:54 am Ishan Chattopadhyaya, < ic

Re: SolrCloud separating compute from storage

On 4/28/23 11:33, Ilan Ginzburg wrote: Salesforce has been working for a while on separating compute from storage in SolrCloud, see presentation at Activate 2019 SolrCloud in Public Cloud: Scaling Compute Independently from Storage . In a nutshell, the idea is that

Re: SolrCloud separating compute from storage

This definitely sounds very interesting and if we could abstract it away from AWS specifically then even better. I think there are a lot of advantages with an approach like this as you've mentioned. At FullStory we are planning to get into some experiments using GCP Local SSDs and Google Cloud Stor

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.1 RC1

(FYI, -1 on a release is not a veto. Just a simple vote.) On Sat, 29 Apr, 2023, 6:53 am Ishan Chattopadhyaya, < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure, carry on with this release. > > I vote -1 on this release, and I'll prepare for a follow on release after > this one is done. > > On Sat, 29 Ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.1 RC1

Sure, carry on with this release. I vote -1 on this release, and I'll prepare for a follow on release after this one is done. On Sat, 29 Apr, 2023, 2:45 am David Smiley, wrote: > I'm going to challenge Ishan and say that there is no change coming that > warrants halting a bugfix/patch release,

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.1 RC1

I'm going to challenge Ishan and say that there is no change coming that warrants halting a bugfix/patch release, as the proposed change that Ishan speaks of is an "improvement" that helps security and is not a bug/vulnerability being fixed. It would also bring a backwards compatibility change. S

Re: SolrCloud separating compute from storage

I mentioned NIO providers for S3, GCS and Azure in a different email thread. This could be used to abstract away the S3 specific code and provide support for GCS and Azure without much more effort. This would make unit tests much easier to write because you can simply unit test to local disk by cha

Re: SolrCloud separating compute from storage

To clarify the point to everyone: "separation of compute from storage" allows infrastructure cost savings for when you have both large scale (many shards in the cluster) and highly diverse collection/index utilization. The vision of our contribution is that an unused shard can scale down to as litt

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.1 RC1

It sounds like the general consensus from the thread regarding the issue was that while some changes to make that less risky are worthwhile, they are not blockers for the release. Did that change? I just hate to hold up the release any longer unless we have a truly blocking issue since there are a

SolrCloud separating compute from storage

Hi, This is a long message, apologies. If responses are positive, there will likely be plenty of other opportunities to discuss the topics mentioned here. I'm trying to see if the community would be interested in a contribution allowing SolrCloud nodes to be totally stateless with persistent stor

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.1 RC1

Hi Justin, I am testing a patch for a security issue discussed privately within the PMC group. Can you please give me another 24 hours to have it fixed? If not, then I'll be pushing for a 9.2.2 release later, once that is resolved. Thank you for your understanding. Regards, Ishan On Fri, 28 Apr 20

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.1 RC1

+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [0:33:17.833968] On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 9:34 AM Arrieta, Alejandro < aarri...@perrinsoftware.com> wrote: > +1 > SUCCESS! [0:29:31.135392] > > And run Solr operator tests successfully following instructions: > Local end-to-end cluster test successfully run! > > ubuntu 23.04

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.2.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:29:31.135392] And run Solr operator tests successfully following instructions: Local end-to-end cluster test successfully run! ubuntu 23.04 amd64 temurin-openjdk11 on virtualbox 7. Kind Regards, Alejandro Arrieta On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 4:23 PM Joel Bernstein wrote: > +1 (bindi