Cool!
I wonder if anyone has tried such things for a Lucene/Solr "Directory" as
well?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 1:14 PM Joel Bernstein wrote:
> I've been testing Java NIO providers for cloud storage. These
Yay, finally!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 9:30 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> DataImportHandler 9.0.0 has now been released for Solr 9.0.0, thanks to
> Krzysztof Deb
24 hours are enough to cover all timezones on earth. Only those on other
planets need more time.
On Fri, 21 Apr, 2023, 4:42 am Jan Høydahl, wrote:
> Bureaucracy sure, but needless? Don't think so. How else can we make
> decisions across time zones and national holidays that ensures every PMC
> m
Bureaucracy sure, but needless? Don't think so. How else can we make decisions
across time zones and national holidays that ensures every PMC member has a
chance to vote? Of course, in this matter it would probably be possible to
persuade INFRA to let Solr "inherit" Lucene's policy immediately,
Vote and 3 days of wait!? This whole Apache process feels like a needless
bureaucracy, stuck in the twentieth century. If such a vote is a strict
necessity, I think we should also get a vote on whether to stick with
Apache.
On Fri, 21 Apr, 2023, 3:52 am Justin Sweeney,
wrote:
> I believe I can c
To subscribe to the dev list, please email dev-subscr...@solr.apache.org
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 7:04 AM guluo wrote:
>
I believe I can continue the release for most of the steps before this will
be a blocking issue. If as a result of the vote, it is decided not to grant
write permissions to non-PMC committers, I'd just need additional support
from a PMC member to complete the 9.2.1 release.
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at
Ah, I never knew this was the default. I see no reason to change our release
practice, so guess we can do a proper VOTE and wait 3 days for it to complete
before the release can happen. I suppose several RM steps can happen before
this is a blocker, or?
Jan
> 20. apr. 2023 kl. 22:24 skrev Hous
Hello team,
noob warning:
today I learned what SIP means. with SIP17 and 18 being very interesting
reads.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Solr+Improvement+Proposals
Too many telephone references.
sorry for the interruption.
Alejandro Arrieta
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 5:27 PM Housto
Thanks for the questions Jason!
So the general idea is that we'd add a Solr contrib/module, and that
> module would have a dep on some sort of Kubernetes client so it could
> manage certain Solr entities (e.g. security.json, configsets, etc.) as
> Kubernetes resources (configmaps, etc.). Am I und
Ahhh I think I know the issue. We haven't had a non-pmc committer do a
release since the Lucene/Solr split. I guess Lucene was setup to support
this, but by default Apache doesn't allow it, so Solr doesn't have it
enabled now.
As per the JIRA infra can do this. Should we get a PMC vote on this?
-
>
> Do you think we'll need a way to mark the nodes as "vacating" or something
> so that they don't receive new replicas (i.e. for newly concurrently
> created collections) while the REPLACENODE is being processed?
>
Great question. This would be an awesome addition. Kind of similar to the
"shutti
I commented.
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 3:59 PM Justin Sweeney
wrote:
> I've created an Infra ticket here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24485. It would probably be
> useful if a few PMC members can comment support for it, I am not sure
> what an approval process looks like for this
I've created an Infra ticket here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24485. It would probably be
useful if a few PMC members can comment support for it, I am not sure
what an approval process looks like for this.
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 3:44 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> +1 to give svn relea
Thanks for working on this SIP Houston, I'm looking forward to use it!
Do you think we'll need a way to mark the nodes as "vacating" or something
so that they don't receive new replicas (i.e. for newly concurrently
created collections) while the REPLACENODE is being processed?
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023
+1 to give svn release permission to all committers!
Jan Høydahl
> 20. apr. 2023 kl. 18:01 skrev Houston Putman :
>
> Yeah it definitely seems like a change in policy.
>
> Justin already can't add his GPG key to the KEYS file, so we know this is
> going to be a blocker now and again when the r
Hey, sorry for the delay y'all!
*I'll first reply to Radu!*
I think it tackles one of the three common use-cases that I've seen for
> autoscaling
I completely agree, this is just the beginning. I think the first use case
would be amazing, and I see
it as an extension of this feature. I have som
I took Jason G’s advice and went ahead and created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16757 to guide me in working on
JIRAs. If you have one that should be related to this umbrella ticket, please
add it!
> On Apr 19, 2023, at 7:57 AM, Eric Pugh
> wrote:
>
> Hi all.. I am planning
My guess is that javabin is already fairly compact, hence doesn't benefit
much from compression. But, would be good to test out the hypothesis, and
would love to be proven wrong here.
On Thu, 20 Apr, 2023, 10:12 pm Alex Deparvu, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to figure out how to enable compressio
Hi,
I am trying to figure out how to enable compression on the Http2SolrClient
to understand if it can help or hurt our workflows.
This question is more about the client support for it, or why it's missing
so far. The server side seems to support compression, I tested with curl
'--compressed' and
Yeah it definitely seems like a change in policy.
Justin already can't add his GPG key to the KEYS file, so we know this is
going to be a blocker now and again when the release vote passes.
The infra page does say "*By default*, only PMC/PPMC members have write
access to the dist/release director
It has not been a blocker before, so I’d just proceed with the release and ask
again if it becomes a problem. Non-pmc committers have certainly been RM before.
Jan Høydahl
> 20. apr. 2023 kl. 17:19 skrev Justin Sweeney :
>
> While working on the 9.2.1 release process, I've hit a bit of a block
While working on the 9.2.1 release process, I've hit a bit of a blocker. It
looks like you must be a PMC member to push to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/solr (based on
https://infra.apache.org/release-publishing.html#normal and
https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/CBX4TSBQ8/p168200173623
Yup, feel free to go ahead and merge that in.
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 10:18 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Justin,
> Do we have time to merge the following, please?
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16741
> Thanks and regards,
> Ishan
>
> On Thu, 20 Ap
Hi Justin,
Do we have time to merge the following, please?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16741
Thanks and regards,
Ishan
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 at 19:37, Justin Sweeney
wrote:
> Thanks for merging that, I'm just getting started along the release
> process, had to get a gpg key setup bu
Thanks for merging that, I'm just getting started along the release
process, had to get a gpg key setup but should be moving today.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 11:03 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Merged.
>
> > 19. apr. 2023 kl. 16:10 skrev Houston Putman :
> >
> > I think that's a good one to include.
> >
A more up to date documentation link is here:
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_11/uploading-structured-data-store-data-with-the-data-import-handler.html
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 at 18:59, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> DataImportHandler 9.0.0 has now been release
Hi all,
DataImportHandler 9.0.0 has now been released for Solr 9.0.0, thanks to
Krzysztof Debski [0].
To use it with the package manager, follow instructions here:
https://github.com/SearchScale/dataimporthandler#installing-and-running
To grab the binaries, please check:
https://github.com/Searc
Sure, Jason. Thanks!
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 at 17:16, Jason Gerlowski wrote:
> Thanks for taking it on Ishan!
>
> (Maybe worth a similar post to the users@ list, so that subset of
> folks knows about the location change?)
>
> Jason
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 6:22 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> wrote
Thanks for taking it on Ishan!
(Maybe worth a similar post to the users@ list, so that subset of
folks knows about the location change?)
Jason
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 6:22 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I had reached out to Rohit, current maintainer of DataImportHandler (
> githu
Hi all,
I had reached out to Rohit, current maintainer of DataImportHandler (
github.com/rohitbemax) regarding new releases. He requested me to take over
the ownership of the repository since his current role doesn't allow him to
make FOSS contributions without due process and approvals. In the int
Not sure why solrbot auto closed this PR now, as we're still on 4.1.90. Looks
like a mistake?
Jan
> 20. apr. 2023 kl. 03:10 skrev solrbot (via GitHub) :
>
>
> solrbot closed pull request #1551: Update io.netty:* to v4.1.91.Final -
> autoclosed
> URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1551
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
