Sounds good, Jan. If you're heading in this direction, I'd recommend
the /tika endpoint with an Accept header set to "application/json".
Please let me know if I can help.
Best,
Tim
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 2:43 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> Documentation wise we can re-write the chapter we
Documentation wise we can re-write the chapter we have on rich text indexing to
mention several options, including tika-server, tika-pipes with solr emitter.
Wrt SolrCell successor, I still think a super-thin module forwarding to
TikaServer is the best. Users would get same features and API as t
Sorry, I think I mixed up BadApples and Nightly.
- Houston
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:05 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Actually, the JWTAuthPluginIntegrationTest is @BadApple so runs even less
> often I believe -
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-BadApples-Tests-main/941/
>
> Jan
>
> >
Apologies for being late to the show, and thank you Eric for pinging me on this.
I'm 100% for factoring out Tika from the same jvm as Solr. I see three options
for removing Tika from Solr's jvm, making it easier for users and keeping
Tika's jar hell all to itself.
1) As already proposed, use T
Actually, the JWTAuthPluginIntegrationTest is @BadApple so runs even less often
I believe -
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-BadApples-Tests-main/941/
Jan
> 23. mar. 2023 kl. 16:56 skrev Houston Putman :
>
> Thanks for the PSA David!
>
> Overall having only 13 entries above 1% f
Thanks for participating Alejandro!
2) You need dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py to run the smoke tests.
> I downloaded the solr src tgz from the artifacts folder, uncompress and
> then ran the smoke test command.
> Is this the correct way to do it?
>
Generally the strategy is checkout the r
Thanks for the PSA David!
Overall having only 13 entries above 1% failure is such an improvement to
the state we were in a year ago, so thank you so much to everyone that has
put in a lot of hard work on that (shout out to Kevin and Mike)!
(The above are out of only 7 runs whereas everything els
Thanks for voting, Alejandro.
All votes count :)
The binding votes from the PMCs are required for passing a release vote,
but all community votes are essential to ensure a stable build.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 8:38 PM Arrieta, Alejandro <
aarri...@perrinsoftware.com> wrote:
> 1) Solr 9.2.0 RC1
+1 (binding)
Ran smoketest and some manual tests. Also reviewed change log.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 8:55 PM Houston Putman wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.2.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.2.0-RC1-rev-92c
Hi,
I have configured LTR in my solr collection and I am able to see my feature and
model file. To test things out I have kept only two features and a very basic
model file. I have attached both the files.
I am able to retrieve the features using the following query :
localhost:8983/solr/waters
1) Solr 9.2.0 RC1
SUCCESS! [0:25:45.706109]
virtualbox ubuntu 22.04 + ubuntu openjdk 11
+0 don't know if my vote counts.
2) Solr operator test (Thanks Houston Putman for the command to run the
solr operator tests)
Ran 6 of 6 Specs in 286.376 seconds
SUCCESS! -- 6 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending
+1
SUCCESS! [0:27:15.62963]
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:14 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> Ran smoke tester and inspected the binary artifacts, release notes and
> CHANGES.
>
> SUCCESS! [0:35:32.006982]
>
> Only a few minors:
>
> * Mal-placed release notes in refguide, fixed in
> https://github.com/apa
Ran smoke tester and inspected the binary artifacts, release notes and CHANGES.
SUCCESS! [0:35:32.006982]
Only a few minors:
* Mal-placed release notes in refguide, fixed in
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1486
* Duplicate CHANGES entries in 9.2 section:
* SOLR-15787: FileSystemConfigSe
13 matches
Mail list logo
