Re: seeking feedback on edismax term-centric/field-centric proposal to resolve mm issue

2023-03-17 Thread Alessandro Benedetti
Adding Daniele to the loop as he's experiencing a similar problem for a customer. I want to take a look at this, but I'm quite busy this period, hope to find sometime in the next two weeks. Thanks Rudi for working on this! Cheers -- *Alessandro Benedetti* Director @ Sease L

Re: seeking feedback on edismax term-centric/field-centric proposal to resolve mm issue

2023-03-17 Thread Rudi Seitz
I've made a draft PR for issue I wrote about back in January -- edismax's unpredictable "flip" between field-centric and term-centric query structures. https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1463 If anyone's interested in this issue but needed to see some code, now there's a draft to look at. In a

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

2023-03-17 Thread Houston Putman
So the documented blockers are almost resolved, thanks Shawn! Eric decided, for the best, that SOLR-10466 should wait for Solr 9.3. I'm probably planning on cutting a release later today Alessandro, but if there is a re-spin, I'd be happy to include SOLR-16674. (Or if y'all think it's ready to go

Re: Caffeine - ISE: Recursive update Re: [JENKINS] Solr-main-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-16.0.2) - Build # 10777 - Unstable!

2023-03-17 Thread Mikhail Khludnev
Thanks for update, Michael. I raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16707. On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 5:47 AM Michael Gibney wrote: > I think this is basically a BooleanQuery and/or SolrRangeQuery variant > of SOLR-15762. BoolQParserPlugin wraps `Occur.FILTER` subclauses in > `FilterQu