Please vote for release candidate 2 for Solr 9.1.1
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.1.1-RC2-rev-d998e63978abfedde3b75bab4ba6e1e78ddb5944
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.
Anyway, I'll look at the failures
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023, 8:25 AM Houston Putman wrote:
> My bad, should have looked at the 24 hours, I only see
> TestPackages.testPluginLoading failing over that timeframe (at 8%)
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 2:37 PM Houston Putman wrote:
>
> > TestPackages is sti
My bad, should have looked at the 24 hours, I only see
TestPackages.testPluginLoading failing over that timeframe (at 8%)
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 2:37 PM Houston Putman wrote:
> TestPackages is still failing between 10%-30% of the time depending on
> what you are looking at.
>
> Is this the same
Hi everyone,
I've been looking into a known issue where edismax sometimes switches from
a term-centric to a field-centric query generation style. This happens when
sow=false and the per-field analyzers generate differing numbers of tokens.
It's a problem worth solving because it causes inconsisten
TestPackages is still failing between 10%-30% of the time depending on what
you are looking at.
Is this the same issue or a different one?
- Houston
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 7:47 PM Noble Paul wrote:
> The tests were causing errors and test logs had exceptions before because
> they were using p
I agree, Michael. We should add more functional validation to the
benchmarks now. It is learning after this episode.
On Tue, 17 Jan, 2023, 11:13 pm Michael Gibney (Jira),
wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comm
Answered your question here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16622
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:57 PM Kevin Risden wrote:
>
> Why was this pushed directly to the release branch with no additional tests?
>
> Why is this ONLY pushed to branch_9_1 and not main or branch_9x first?
>
> https:/
Agreed, thanks for catching this. The vote on RC1 is canceled and the
artifacts have been removed. I will proceed with building RC2 shortly.
Michael
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:22 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agree, this needs a re-spin. The effect of the bug was t
Why was this pushed directly to the release branch with no additional tests?
Why is this ONLY pushed to branch_9_1 and not main or branch_9x first?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16414 was pushed to main and
branch_9x.
Kevin Risden
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:42 AM wrote:
> This is
Agree, this needs a re-spin. The effect of the bug was that shards
were not recovering on startup, hence queries were failing (503).
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 5:43 PM Noble Paul wrote:
>
> apparently the failures went away after this
>
> https://github.com/apache/solr/commit/1d7b7795cc77ad6863832e3
apparently the failures went away after this
https://github.com/apache/solr/commit/1d7b7795cc77ad6863832e3a87d144a68490ba06
This is a serious bug. IMHO we should commit that and do a respin
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 6:14 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
11 matches
Mail list logo
