> It seems reasonable to me. To count facets Solr needs docsets of results
> for in-order processing.
> I suppose, SimpleFacets code can be amended so it keeps the result docset
> out of filter cache, but would it get significant gain?
Mostly I think this is about expectations, and perhaps this
Hi, Andy.
It seems reasonable to me. To count facets Solr needs docsets of results
for in-order processing.
I suppose, SimpleFacets code can be amended so it keeps the result docset
out of filter cache, but would it get significant gain?
Why do you think that thousands of evictions is a bad thing?
I've been working on tuning my filter cache, and have discovered that doing a
search with facet=on results in an entry in the filter cache for the q
parameter. This makes no sense to me. Is this intentional?
In my app, there are only a couple of dozen possible FQs that can get passed to
Solr. T
Small update: for a variety of scheduling reasons and to have
sufficient prep time, we're pushing the third workshop back two weeks
to December 1st. Hope to see you there!
Best,
Jason
On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 11:53 AM Eric Pugh
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Firstly, to build on the momentum from the fi
I vaguely recall it and I believe it refers to our old Admin UI. If we don't
have a tempaltes/ folder anymore then it can be removed I guess.
Jan
> 16. nov. 2022 kl. 03:04 skrev Gus Heck :
>
> I was looking at web.xml and it has the following:
>
>
> excludePatterns
>
> /partials/.+,/
Thanks everyone for voting. The vote has passed, I'll work on releasing the
artifacts soon.
On Wed, 16 Nov, 2022, 1:06 am Alessandro Benedetti,
wrote:
> SUCCESS! [0:42:09.371846]
>
> +1 !
> Thanks again Ishan for following this release!
> --
> *Alessandro Benedetti*
> Dir
