Good point! I hadn’t even thought of that. Will do, and if Jenkins blows up,
untangle in the morning.
> On Jul 19, 2022, at 8:36 PM, Houston Putman wrote:
>
> If the spotless works on the PR, which the github actions indicate, then
> you might as well just merge the PR instead of reverting.
>
If the spotless works on the PR, which the github actions indicate, then
you might as well just merge the PR instead of reverting.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 8:12 PM Eric Pugh
wrote:
> Good news, the spotless check for wildcard imports works…. The bad news
> is that I thought SOLR-16271 was comple
Good news, the spotless check for wildcard imports works…. The bad news is
that I thought SOLR-16271 was complete and there were no wildcard imports…
I can revert the change to main and branch_9x, or maybe someone wants to
confirm https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/949 and then the build shoul
The migration you speak of is in Lucene, not Solr. It would be noticed by
"Watchers".
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:29 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Great find! Lets have it
Great find! Lets have it committed.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 9:49 PM Bram Van Dam wrote:
> Thanks for your reply, David. Given the apparent migration from from
> Jira->Github, I didn't think that would get more response than the
> mailing list 😅
>
> We've been running a patched version of 7.7 wit
Thanks for your reply, David. Given the apparent migration from from
Jira->Github, I didn't think that would get more response than the
mailing list 😅
We've been running a patched version of 7.7 with a smaller Versions
arraylist for a while now, without any ill effects.
- Bram
On 13/07/202
