It's really a wonderful upgrade to the ref guide!
The home/landing page has a "Query Guide" navigation panel linking directly
to the "Common Query Parameters" page. That's wrong; it should point to
the top-most page about queries, which happens to be "Query Syntax and
Parsers". The same issue is
This was an absolute monster, but I’m happy to see the community get out a
release that is more stable, scalable, flexible, and secure.
Big accomplishment. Thank you all for your service.
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:00 PM David Smiley wrote:
> Woohoo!
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Sear
Woohoo!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:09 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
>
> +1 11 (9 binding)
> 0 0
> -1 0
>
> This vote has PASSED
>
> I'll wait
As usual, I recorded the session. It was an hour long. If you're a
committer who wants access, just let me know and I will share it!
+1 non binding.
I absolutely love it.
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 2:50 AM Alessandro Benedetti
wrote:
> Hi Jan,
> I took a look, there's no problem with the triple search as before (but
> this was expected as Houston gave the explanation weeks ago).
> The new sections look good as well (minor forma
*super efforts
On Tue, 10 May, 2022, 10:41 pm Ishan Chattopadhyaya, <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Heartfelt thanks for your support efforts, Jan and Houston!
>
> On Tue, 10 May, 2022, 8:39 pm Jan Høydahl, wrote:
>
>> It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
>>
>> +1
Heartfelt thanks for your support efforts, Jan and Houston!
On Tue, 10 May, 2022, 8:39 pm Jan Høydahl, wrote:
> It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
>
> +1 11 (9 binding)
> 0 0
> -1 0
>
> This vote has PASSED
>
> I'll wait until tomorrow with publishing the artifac
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
+1 11 (9 binding)
0 0
-1 0
This vote has PASSED
I'll wait until tomorrow with publishing the artifacts and announcing the
release, to allow some latest edits to RefGuide.
Congrats!
Jan
> 5. mai 2022 kl. 09:48 skrev Jan Høyd
Michael - can you file a JIRA issue with details of the environment and
failure that you saw? Happy to take a look at it once we know what the
problem is.
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 3:55 PM Michael Gibney
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [0:49:30.542503]
>
> I ran the smoketester, but did not
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [0:56:17.682093]
Kevin Risden
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 3:34 AM Marcus Eagan wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Smoke test...
>
> SUCCESS! [1:21:36.996264]
>
> I also checked a few areas (admin actions and security manager) in case
> there were issues. No issues on my side.
>
>
Hi Jan,
I took a look, there's no problem with the triple search as before (but
this was expected as Houston gave the explanation weeks ago).
The new sections look good as well (minor formatting with the dense vector
similarity distances, but I don't really know how to fix it/ if it is worth
fixing
+1 (non-binding)
Smoke test...
SUCCESS! [1:21:36.996264]
I also checked a few areas (admin actions and security manager) in case
there were issues. No issues on my side.
Excited to pitch in on a few areas in SOLR version 9.
Nice work all, especially the folks driving this release.
On Mon, M
12 matches
Mail list logo
