+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [1:05:27.496955]
> On May 6, 2022, at 11:16 AM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [0:47:39.581876]
>
> Just ran the smoke tester for this one, didn't have time to do any
> other manual tests.
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:47 PM Mike Drob wrote:
>>
>>
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [0:47:39.581876]
Just ran the smoke tester for this one, didn't have time to do any
other manual tests.
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:47 PM Mike Drob wrote:
>
> [INFO] There was an issue with SOLR-16133 that caused the smoke tester to
> fail with gpg errors on macOS. That chan
> But since yours would also require a solr server module, you could make a
server module without any code maybe and just rely on the new solrj module?
Hmm, interesting idea... I was aware of the push to split up SolrJ and
thought about going that route, but I didn't want to give up the "Off The
Hey everyone, a reminder to fill out your available times above. I will be
making a selection in a day or two and announce it before the week starts.
- Houston
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:23 AM Houston Putman wrote:
> Hello Solr committers,
>
> The time has come for the next committers meeting.
>
