Re: CloudSolrClient; do we deprecate or not?

I pushed the rename we discussed and added change notes. I can see that the naming/deprecation choice varies between standalone vs SolrCloud (simple deprecation vs rename & swap). Not a problem but not ideal. I don't care too much because a user will likely do just one or the other and not care

Re: CloudSolrClient; do we deprecate or not?

Hi all, Please help close this last(?) 9.0 blocker by reviewing https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/750 Jan > 18. mar. 2022 kl. 13:51 skrev David Smiley : > > The name CloudHttp1SolrClient is understandable because we have one with > "Http2" in the