Re: CloudSolrClient; do we deprecate or not?

2022-03-15 Thread David Smiley
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 8:47 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > I re-opened SOLR-15223 to highlight that we are still blocked by this > decision. > > I don't clearly see the full effects of your suggestion right now. Does > your proposal also involve deprecating CloudHttp2SolrClient as a separate > class? >

[Operator] [VOTE] Release the Solr Operator v0.5.1 RC2

2022-03-15 Thread Houston Putman
Please vote for release candidate 2 for the Solr Operator v0.5.1 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-operator/solr-operator-v0.5.1-RC2-revafa762893f16857b86b2ae9fc5365d21ada49a29 You can run the full smoke tester, with instructions below. However

Re: [Operator] [VOTE] Release the Solr Operator v0.5.1 RC1

2022-03-15 Thread Houston Putman
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: +1 1 (1 binding) 0 0 -1 1 Reason for failing is too many negative votes. On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:47 PM Timothy Potter wrote: > -1 for RC1 ... I wasn't able to run the smoke tester due to: > > Check to make sure the manifest

Re: CloudSolrClient; do we deprecate or not?

2022-03-15 Thread Jan Høydahl
I re-opened SOLR-15223 to highlight that we are still blocked by this decision. I don't clearly see the full effects of your suggestion right now. Does your proposal also involve deprecating CloudHttp2SolrClient as a separate class? I would imagine users with existing SolrJ code would after upgra