Re: Tagger Handler response format - change proposition

I posted a JIRA issue & PR: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15944 ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 3:13 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) < cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: > Based on similar u

2022 April, Solr committer meeting

I propose that the next committer meeting be held on Thursday, April 14th. I'd be happy to host again unless someone wishes to take over. The time is TBD. Continuing from today's meeting: We discussed the meeting invitation itself a little. To be clear, all committers are officially invited via

Re: Quarterly Committer Meetings

Thanks for the comments Shawn but maybe follow-ups to your ideas should be a new email thread so we can keep this thread about the meeting itself. I just want to follow-up on this thread as I've done in the past. We actually got through the agenda https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/

Re: Moving out all Hadoop plugins into one module

That's why a package system tends to be a complex beast, with a dependency tree between packages etc, so you'd have a hadoop-common package and hadoop-auth and hadoop-hdfs that depend on it. But I don't know if we want to go there, package management is not Solr's core business. Another thing t

Re: Moving out all Hadoop plugins into one module

Yea it would be duplicate jars in both places. It is a shame both share the name "hadoop" since the two features - filesystem and authentication. They end up being two entirely different things both in Hadoop itself and inside of Solr. Kevin Risden On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 4:58 PM David Smiley w

Re: Moving out all Hadoop plugins into one module

Separate modules will mean our distro will end up duplicating hadoop-common and other related JARs for both modules. I was trying to be practical. But it's not important to me; ok. implementation ('org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-common') { transitive = false } // too many to ignore implementation ('org

Re: Moving out all Hadoop plugins into one module

My preference would be as a separate HadoopAuthentication or something module. HDFS the filesystem / blockcache / etc support is unique and separate from the authentication part. It shouldn't all be in one module. Kevin Risden On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 4:48 PM David Smiley wrote: > The issue htt

Moving out all Hadoop plugins into one module

The issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14660 is about moving the HDFS plugins out of core into a module. While a great thing, it still leaves quite a few Hadoop related dependencies in solr-core because Hadoop is not there only for HDFS; it's there for some exotic authentication & au

Re: [DISCUSS] Mark Rate Limiting as Experimental for Solr 9.0

Perhaps we need a dev-docs/alpha-beta-ga.adoc which lays out how developers should tag and document a feature/module as alpha or beta quality, what kind of logging it requires, perhaps it requires adding a -Dsolr.myfeature.enable=true if it is in solr-core, @lucene-experimental annotations etc.

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.0.0

I'd classify both those as bugs, even if the fix breaks a public HTTP API. If they are low hanging, go ahead, just make sure of course to call out the compat break in "Major Changes". Jan > 20. jan. 2022 kl. 20:02 skrev Houston Putman : > > Any issues with me finishing and merging SOLR-15842

Re: [DISCUSS] Mark Rate Limiting as Experimental for Solr 9.0

I meant to bring this up at the meeting, but forgot. How _do_ we mark it? Probably red guide, javadocs, and sample solrconfig.xml need to be updated? Maybe a log message if it’s turned on? Mike On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 12:45 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > +1 to mark as Beta or experimental. Is this a d

Re: Quarterly Committer Meetings

On 1/10/22 7:36 PM, David Smiley wrote: I volunteer to do the next 4 of them, and to use the Google Meet platform.  I can record them for the benefit of anyone who can't make it. Many thanks to you for your work on this!  I was quiet, mostly because the things I think about are very long-term

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.0.0

Any issues with me finishing and merging SOLR-15842 and SOLR-15884 for 9.0.0? They are both backwards incompatible changes but are really good things to include for 9.0. They are also both fairly

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.0.0

Hi, The list of release blockers can be seen with this JIRA filter: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12351219 After the committer's meeting today we decided to add these to the blockers list: - SOLR-15556Ref Guide Redesign Phase 3: Replace Jekyll - SOLR-15917Rename 'contrib

Re: [DISCUSS] Mark Rate Limiting as Experimental for Solr 9.0

+1 to mark as Beta or experimental. Is this a doc-only change? Jan > 12. jan. 2022 kl. 16:59 skrev Mike Drob : > > Howdy folks, > > After finding two quick bugs in the rate limiting code[1][2], I suspect that > this feature has largely gone untested in our code up until now. I also > looked a

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.0.0

Hi, I did a successful test-build of an RC with the releas wizard yesterday, with 0 test failures (what's the chance of that :) ? Currently fixing the smoke tester to accept the new docker/ folder we added to the structure and a few more things. Once I have a passing smoketester locally we are a