On 1/6/2022 2:03 PM, David Smiley wrote:
The new Shenandoah GC looks exciting but may not be sufficiently ready
for us to recommend (if I recall from a recent user who reported a
problem with it) -- and that's okay.
I've done some experiments with Shenandoah and ZGC. My index is tiny,
155297
> branch_9x is in feature freeze! We want to stabilize
Feature freeze is meant for the release branches. There is no precedent for
having a feature freeze on the stable branch. I urge you to follow well
established processes and not invent new processes on the fly and hold the
project hostage to t
> What do we think about a "beta" release, to give users (including
*ourselves* in many cases) more time to try out 9.0 to report issues?
+1
> It would be a shame to release Solr 9 without support for the vector
based index in Lucene 9. Thankfully there's a JIRA issue with a PR!
https://issues.ap
I tend to Agree with David
We should have a compelling feature in Solr 9 which will encourage users to
try it out. Solr 9 does not have any such feature and it is mostly a
cleanup that most users do not really care about.
+1 to include SOLR-15880 (even if we have to release it as experimental)
O
It is obviously confusing to treat 9x banch as release branch and main as both
10.0 and 9.next.
I can symphatize with wanting a place to land 9.1 backports right now.
If we continue with current setup and wait with cutting 9_0, committers could
adapt a workflow like this
* Merge your PR to main
branch_9x is in feature freeze! We want to stabilize, fix bugs and remove
blockers on that branch, not add features - unless they are agreed as a blocker
for the release.
If everyone starts pushing all kinds of new features to 9x now, it will never
stabilize.
>>> >>> Q: But my feature is almost
👍
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 1:48 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Much appreciated Anshum.
> This may tie in with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15898
> too, but no obligation :)
>
> Jan
>
> 7. jan. 2022 kl. 04:16 skrev Anshum Gupta :
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> Thanks for doing most of the heavy lifting. I
I wanted to share that our hack day did happen, but it went a bit sideways as
we spent the first half of the day experimenting with how to support CORS in
Solr. So API related, but not JAX-RS API specific. The second half of the
day got consumed by $dayjob.
We’re going to pick it up again n
Since a 9.0 release branch has not been cut, I backported the SOLR-15694 to
branch_9x. If there are any concerns, we can discuss reverting it from
branch_9_0 later.
Thanks and regards.
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 10:34 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > let it bake in main
If we are doing a "feature freeze" for 9.0, then I think we need to cut
branch_9_0. Otherwise there is going to be at least a month of features
slated for 9.1 that only get committed to 10x. There are bound to be
tickets/commits that fall through and don't end up on branch_9x even though
they are s
> let it bake in main (10.0) for some time, letting more devs try it out
Please define "some time". Is 3 weeks until the 9.0 release not enough?
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 10:26 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> I think it is premature to add it to branch_9x yet. First get +1 from key
> stakeholders on the P
I think it is premature to add it to branch_9x yet. First get +1 from key
stakeholders on the PR, then let it bake in main (10.0) for some time, letting
more devs try it out. If all looks good at that point, we may consider it,
especially if the default behaviour is === 8.x.
What do others thin
> Btw - does Solr have any benchmarks published yet, that we can compare
8.11 with 9.0? Would be very useful.
I can work on it over the weekend. I have some suites ready with me, but
not automated yet.
>* Today*: Cut branch_9x and enter feature freeze on that branch
I'd like to include SOLR-1569
Much appreciated Anshum.
This may tie in with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15898 too, but
no obligation :)
Jan
> 7. jan. 2022 kl. 04:16 skrev Anshum Gupta :
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> Thanks for doing most of the heavy lifting. I can help out with this.
>
> -Anshum
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 202
14 matches
Mail list logo
