Re: [Solr] does not use the filterCache

On 1/3/2022 5:00 PM, David Smiley wrote: The filter cache contains unsorted lists of docs; an entry ultimately needs to be sorted to what the user wants.  The score in particular requires actually running the query, at which point there isn't a point in using the filter cache.  Well sort of; I

Re: [Solr] does not use the filterCache

Daniele, The filter cache contains unsorted lists of docs; an entry ultimately needs to be sorted to what the user wants. The score in particular requires actually running the query, at which point there isn't a point in using the filter cache. Well sort of; I could imagine a hybrid to visit onl

Re: [Solr] does not use the filterCache

Hi Mikhail, Thanks for your reply. Probably I wasn't clear enough, actually, in the piece of code I pointed out , the searcher decides whether t

Re: Solr 9.0.0 release in February

I completely agree with Houston; let's not create branch_9_0 yet. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 11:36 AM Houston Putman wrote: > I think its fine to start with just branch_9x until we are ready to > actually do

Re: Solr 9.0.0 release in February

I think its fine to start with just branch_9x until we are ready to actually do the release, even if it is unconventional for our processes. There’s no need to have a branch_9_0 until there are actual reasons that 9x and 9_0 would differ (i.e. 9.0.0 is ready to be released and people want to add t

Re: [Solr] does not use the filterCache

Hi, Adrien. Thanks for forwarding this. Daniele, you pointed to the code which bypasses Lucene searching and just sorts cached docset. Applying filter before searching is done by getProcessedFilter() https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/c2db3a943e665cfb39e9ea53640be40cf2c09fbc/solr/core/src/java/org

Re: Solr 9.0.0 release in February

Happy New Year everyone! According to my initial mail it's now time to cut branch_9x. However, I'm in the middle of some build and build-script tuning, so it may delay a few days more. I'm also wondering whether it's better to cut both branch_9x and well as branch_9_0 so everyone can continue

Re: [Solr] does not use the filterCache

Hi Daniele, This is the Lucene dev list, I'm redirecting your question to dev@solr.apache.org. On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 5:35 PM Daniele Antuzi wrote: > > Hi, > I was taking a look at the Solr searcher to see how the filterCache is used: > https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/c2db3a943e665cfb39e9e

Re: 7.7.x-mas

I have updated the text :) Jan > 3. jan. 2022 kl. 12:29 skrev Ishan Chattopadhyaya : > > +1 to this text, seems much less scary to me. Thanks! > > On Mon, 3 Jan, 2022, 3:12 pm Jan Høydahl, > wrote: > Here is an alternative text that is more concrete that new users

Re: 7.7.x-mas

+1 to this text, seems much less scary to me. Thanks! On Mon, 3 Jan, 2022, 3:12 pm Jan Høydahl, wrote: > Here is an alternative text that is more concrete that new users should > choose 8.x, and that 7.7.3 users must take some action. Perhaps this text > has less risk of being interpreted that w

Re: 7.7.x-mas

Here is an alternative text that is more concrete that new users should choose 8.x, and that 7.7.3 users must take some action. Perhaps this text has less risk of being interpreted that we don't care about patching previous versions? Don't get me wrong, I agree that it would benefit our users to

Re: 7.7.x-mas

This is a special situation while we are in the process of releasing 9.0 and we have previously promised, but then failed to, keep 7.x up to date with security releases. So I think this clarifies the situation, and once 9.0 is out we're back to normal, when 7.7 is EOL and 8.11.x is patched. I th