The annotation framework is just a single class and it is made to work well
with Solr instead of changing Solr to suit the needs of some external
framework. There are no known issues with the current system and there are
unknown issues that you'll face introducing a new framework.
Solr is not a ge
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 12:53 AM Mike Drob wrote:
> Replying to the top post in this thread because there has been a lot of
> discussion and I don't want to look like I'm continuing any of those
> particular threads.
>
> I finally had time to sit down and think about this with the attention it
>
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 12:53 AM Mike Drob wrote:
> Replying to the top post in this thread because there has been a lot of
> discussion and I don't want to look like I'm continuing any of those
> particular threads.
>
> I finally had time to sit down and think about this with the attention it
>
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your thoughtful responses and the structured manner of your
composing this mail (with clear labels as to your intent) is a refreshing
change. I think we all should learn from this in future communication.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 12:53 AM Mike Drob wrote:
> Replying to the top
Looks like Jersey can build endpoints and APIs programmatically too, see
https://eclipse-ee4j.github.io/jersey.github.io/documentation/latest3x/resource-builder.html
So I guess it can be done by hooking in at the right places if we want.
It would be really encouraging if we could modernize this pa
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 8:44 PM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> > We need to make an API work on a per core basis and cores can come up
> and go down randomly
>
> Ah, yeah. I'll admit I was overlooking some of the wrinkles around
> custom request handlers etc. That is a problem for switching to some
>
> We need to make an API work on a per core basis and cores can come up and go
> down randomly
Ah, yeah. I'll admit I was overlooking some of the wrinkles around
custom request handlers etc. That is a problem for switching to some
off-the-shelf framework for sure. It may still be possible, but
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 6:23 AM Mike Drob wrote:
> Replying to the top post in this thread because there has been a lot of
> discussion and I don't want to look like I'm continuing any of those
> particular threads.
>
> I finally had time to sit down and think about this with the attention it
> d
The @JsonProperty annotations are added because it's a dependency in SolrJ
as well
If SolrJ has a Jackson dependency, it can have a conflict (different
versions) with the Jackson used by the client app.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021, 5:21 PM Noble Paul wrote:
> Also keep in mind that the same endpoint ca
