Re: 8.10 docker image please

I dug into this some. The 8.9 commit hash there (a1a59) was incorrect; it was for a PR that after merging became something else. https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr/pull/380 (see first commit in there). The official-docker-images PR was crafted prematurely by the contributor. I'm not sure w

Re: 8.10 docker image please

: 2) changing the GitCommit associated with 8.9.0 : : ...the last one is the biggest WTF, allthough frankly the 'new' GitCommit : seems "correct" while the 'old' GitCommit (currently listed in : docker-library/official-images.git's copy of library/solr) doesn't exist : at all in docker-solr/d

Re: 8.10 docker image please

: I granted Hossman access. So thanks ... but i don't really understand what is suppose to happen now? : I also reviewed the Travis-CI integration and for some reason it just isn't : working. Not critical though -- just need to test manually. Yeah ... I know nothing about Travis CI (not s

Re: ZkCmdExecutor

You actually capture most of the history of cloud there AB. ZK is the heart of the system. It’s a rare chance you get the time or financing to lay that out on something that will be used. I didn’t get it done, changed jobs, and that mostly closed the window on that. Then you have a poor heart th

Re: Solr Docker CI Integration - Nightly builds

Got the ball rolling here: INFRA-22375 On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 5:43 PM David Smiley wrote: > Okay; +1 to your proposal: apache/solr-nightly:9.0.0-SNAPSHOT > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/dav

Re: Solr Docker CI Integration - Nightly builds

Okay; +1 to your proposal: apache/solr-nightly:9.0.0-SNAPSHOT ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:56 AM Houston Putman wrote: > Did you need to coordinate with Infra to create the job? I see the build >> machine

Re: Metrics Reporting

Other than the first one which is simple, Solr doesn't and can't report the others because it operates at a lower level, below the notion of what a search session even is. Solr doesn't know who the user is or what a conversion is. I suspect LucidWorks Fusion may help here but I'm not sure. ~ Dav

Metrics Reporting

Hi , We have a requirement to build a reporting system to fetch the below list of data. 1. Number of search requests. 2. Number of unique sessions (unique search session). 3. Average Number of search requests per session. 4. Sessions converted (When the user clicked on the result).

Now that 8.10 is out ... let's get rolling on 9!

Hi Folks, Having just finished up the 8.10 release, it feels like this is a good time to start pushing harder for a 9.0 release. There are so many improvements in the 9 (main) branches and backporting features to 8x is becoming onerous. I realize Solr needs a Lucene 9 release before it can procee

Re: ZkCmdExecutor

I very much agree. That code is the root of a very surprising amount of evil and has been for a surprisingly long time. There is a long list of reasons that I won’t iterate of why I don’t see that as likely happening though - just starting with Ive brought it up to various people over a couple yea

Re: ZkCmdExecutor

+1 to start working towards using Curator, this is long overdue and sooner or later we need to eat this frog - as you dig deeper and deeper it turns out that many issues in Solr can be attributed to our home-grown ZK code, there are maybe 2 people on the Solr team who understand what’s going on