Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene/Solr 8.10.0

2021-09-14 Thread Timothy Potter
Ahem ... unfortunately there will not be an 8.10 RC this week. I'm headed out on vacation tomorrow, back at keys on Monday, Sept 20 unless someone else wants to pick up the RM duties before then? After failing the test suite at various places and other weirdness like .asc files not getting created

Re: Discuss SIP-14 Embedded Zookeeper

2021-09-14 Thread Mike Drob
I like the idea of starting nodes in a ZK-only mode, probably we would call it something like coordination mode. It ties in to ideas that I've had while discussing with other folks about other Solr node specializations, like "edge" nodes that are part of a cluster but do not host collections and ex

Re: Discuss SIP-14 Embedded Zookeeper

2021-09-14 Thread Jan Høydahl
Thanks for kicking this off Mike. I added a few "rejected alternatives" and put a few questions for thought in a comment. You may want to keep all discussion in this email thread, so here are the questions copied: This is promising! Question: Would this mode be valuable also for Kubernetes depl

Discuss SIP-14 Embedded Zookeeper

2021-09-14 Thread Mike Drob
Devs, We've previously discussed maintaining ZK as being an operational hurdle for some groups getting started or migrating to SolrCloud from non-ZK cloud mode. I'd like to discuss the idea of embedding ZK in our own process control. Please see the SIP at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displ

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene/Solr 8.10.0

2021-09-14 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya
All the best, this is the worst step. On Tue, 14 Sep, 2021, 10:47 pm Timothy Potter, wrote: > Building RC1 now ... stay tuned. > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:30 PM Timothy Potter > wrote: > > > > Thanks for the update Mike! > > > > I'm backporting SOLR-15620 right now and am cooking up a quick PR

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene/Solr 8.10.0

2021-09-14 Thread Timothy Potter
Building RC1 now ... stay tuned. On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:30 PM Timothy Potter wrote: > > Thanks for the update Mike! > > I'm backporting SOLR-15620 right now and am cooking up a quick PR for > SOLR-15621, which looks like an easy win for the issue Cassandra > reported on Slack earlier today. > >