Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

Oh, I see what you meant! I actually just redid the changes from scratch instead of trying to backport the 9.0 changes as a patch, so no worries on that front. Thanks for thinking of me there though! I just committed some changes for morelikethis.adoc that I decided I’d like to backport into br

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

Thanks, Cassandra. When I skimmed the initial changeset, I saw that there were changes to build.gradle - I assumed that there would have to be some changes to build.xml in the 8x branch, but I didn't investigate further on how they would differ. Was just trying to be helpful and give you a heads up

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

I feel kind of weird about this one, is there a slightly less minimal patch that is still reasonably safe and would let us continue to avoid problematic terminology? On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:18 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > Mike, > I'd like to backport SOLR-15216 (UI Fix) > > On Mon, Mar 29

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

I pushed up the URL changes I mentioned. Not sure what you mean, Mike, by “gradle->ant translation”? The build process is different in branch_8x but it’s documented in the how-to-contribute page in the ref guide that talks about contributing and building, etc. On Mar 29, 2021, 12:55 PM -0500, Mi

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

Mike, I'd like to backport SOLR-15216 (UI Fix) On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:55 AM Mike Drob wrote: > Ignacio, Alan - I have looked at the patches and these should be safe to > backport and useful in a bugfix. Please go ahead and commit, and update > CHANGES entry as well. > > Cassandra - yes, I pl

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

Ignacio, Alan - I have looked at the patches and these should be safe to backport and useful in a bugfix. Please go ahead and commit, and update CHANGES entry as well. Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be som

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

Hi Mike, I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource). Thanks, Alan > On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera > wrote: > > I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distan

Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Check-main - Build # 222 - Still Unstable!

Mike: SOLR-15244 is still causing 100% failures for several tests on main (regardless of seed) ... can you please either fix or revert? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15244?focusedCommentId=17309666&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-173

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

You mentioned maybe re-publishing the Ref Guide in one of the issues, do you still want to do that? If so, I should backport URL changes for the project split (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15212) - it won’t be a problem for me to do that before the end of this week. On Mar 29, 2021

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix only touches one class tho so very low risk. lucene On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob wrote: > Ishan, > > Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfort

Re: The Solr Reference Branch - before the book, the cheesy cliff notes.

As I was working some rough draft on the doc, i did start to play around with this, even did a little test recording to prep the video. As almost always, the constant and ridiculous and sometimes scary and then often back with a vengeance to make scary look like possible insanity, de ja vu was rol