Awesome! Congratulations!
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Bruno Aranda wrote:
> Congrats!!! And forget sleeping...
>
> Bruno
>
> On 11 February 2011 22:36, Hazem Saleh wrote:
>
>> Congratulations Werner!
>> I bet you are a very good father.
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Werner Punz w
My two cents:
http://zwadia.com/?p=91
Cheers,
Zubin.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Arash Rajaeeyan wrote:
> Oracle is a bigger competitor for IBM, has a more aggressive strategy and
> much less committed to open source,for example they have promised to open
> source Oracle ADF RC for near
MyFacers,
Looking for some capable JSF developers in the New York City area.
Experience with JDeveloper / ADF / Weblogic is preferred but not compulsory.
Candidates WILL be evaluated thoroughly for technical competence.
I usually don't post here, but this is a good gig with real-world benefits
fo
Agree with Werner's assessment on JSF2.0 adoption. The 1.2 adoption curve
shouldn't be a benchmark for 2.0 adoption.
I think 2.0, when it goes final, is going to have significant uptake. Apple
might already be using the Mojarra snapshot for one of its rebate processes:
http://weblogs.java.net/blo
Simon,
You can do a search for Subject = '[OT] JSF 2.0' on the Dev list.
I believe that discussion, begun by MW turned into a discussion about branch
creation... then a couple of +1s followed and I assume that's where the
branch was born.
Cheers,
Zubin.
On 8/28/08, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL P
+1
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [1] useful = very useful.
>
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Volker,
>>
>> I promise to do a separated one for commons after finishing my Tomahawk
>> release tasks (Althoug
+1
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> 2008/6/6 Zubin Wadia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> +
+1
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Hazem Saleh schrieb:
>>>
>>>
Congratulations, may your enthusiasm for open source energize MF more than
ever!
Cheers,
Zubin.
On 5/16/08, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Welcome!
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Welcome in!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:0
That name might be difficult to apply:
http://www.captaris.com/alchemy/
Otherwise, welcome! +1.
On 5/14/08, Jihoon Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Since I wanted to have a clear understanding of community's viewpoint
> of whether the contribution should be part of MyFaces subproject,
-1
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > After I started modifying of the Exporter component syntax,
> > *
> > To be like this :**
> >
> > > fil
https://xhtmlrenderer.dev.java.net/
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Martin Marinschek <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Hazem,
>
> I have just helped implementing a PDF export in Credit-Suisse (I have
> to say it is proprietory code, though) - and what we did was using
> Flying-Saucer. You might w
I can see what you see but I also see a biology experiment...
On 3/27/08, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmmm,
>
> I see it as an orchestra, the solo brown dot being the chief and the
> others the musicians...
>
> ~ Simon
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
> [E
http://ode.apache.org/ -> another nice one from the Apache family.
On 12/11/07, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Awesome design!
>
> yes, but we should really include this all in our maven-based site-build
>
>
> Yes, we shoud indeed
>
> On Dec 11, 2007 10:33 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EM
Well done Mario, Simon & Werner... congratulations on the release!
Cheers,
Zubin.
On 10/12/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Apache MyFaces Orchestra team is pleased to announce the release of
> Apache MyFaces Orchestra Core 1.0.
>
> Apache MyFaces Orchestra is a library wh
We should have countered on TSS, that's where the FUD damage was done
mostly. Good counter regardless.
Cheers,
Zubin.
On 9/15/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well done, Martin.
> Thanks for taking the time to counter at full length.
> --Manfred
>
> On 9/15/07, Martin Marinschek
Martin,
I think that's what is already happening. If nothing is set - the
conversation dies with the session.
It used to be that it was hard-wired to last 30 mins.
If a specific setting is made in the config, then it supercedes the default
which = session timeout.
Cheers,
Zubin
On 9/7/07, Mar
On 8/31/07, Zubin Wadia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/31/07, Andrew Robinson (JIRA) wrote:
> >
> > [
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
> > ]
> >
On 8/31/07, Andrew Robinson (JIRA) wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
> ]
>
> Andrew Robinson resolved TRINIDAD-653.
> --
>
>Resolution: Fixed
> Fix
Terrific! Congratulations to everyone involved.
Cheers,
Zubin.
On 7/18/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Apache MyFaces team is pleased to announce the release of MyFaces
Core 1.2.0.
MyFaces Core 1.2.x is a JavaServer(tm) Faces 1.2 implementation as
specified by JSR-252.
+1, great mediation Manfred.
Cheers,
Zubin.
On 5/25/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I want to get rid of that 1.2 vs. 2.0 discussion blocker. Therefore I
will try to summarize all of the arguments and collect the pros and
cons once more. The goal is to find a compromise
up to
this point, this has been due to the elimination of the previous
coupling between Core and Tomahawk (a process that was more involved
and took longer than anyone expected).
For tomahawk, my "don't care" suggestion for versioning would be to
use the same version as "share
There will always be an impedence mismatch here because MyFaces no longer
represents the "Spec" but also various component projects. So I see
Manfred/Matze's point.
This is why I have always advocated letting the Component initiatives reign
alone in terms of their version order, release frequency
+1 for 1.2.
IMO, Save 2.0 for JSF2.0. It's just easier to explain to non-community
members that way and keeps it aligned with the spec releases.
Cheers,
Zubin.
On 5/18/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So,
any interest in making this to 2.0.0 ?
-Matthias
On 2/23/07, Manf
Kito,
Here are the current unassigned issues as per Martin Haimberger's report to
the list previously:
MYFACES-1563 - Christoph will do that.
MYFACES-1255 - Crosschecked with RI -> Only javadoc
MYFACES-1264 - Christoph will do that.
MYFACES-1253 - Crosschecked with RI -> Only javadoc and specifi
I would like two different TLPs:
1. MyFaces Implementation (keeps progressing with the specification's
maturity).
2. JSF Component Libraries (whatever their names will be in the
future) which work with Sun & MyFaces Implementations. Not one. But both. If
they only work with MyFaces then there is
[+] Apache MyFaces Orchestra
[ ] Apache MyFaces Aurora
[ ] Apache MyFaces Connections
Although, it really should be called 'Choreo'... coming from the word
'Choreograph'...
oh well, too late!
Cheers,
Zubin.
On 3/8/07, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[+] Apache MyFaces
Apache Faces Concerto anyone?
Zubin.
On 2/27/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What about something completely different:
Apache MyFaces Aurora
Positive thing, no? Seriously.
Ciao,
Mario
Well done Andreas :), thanks for moving 1.2 along in the right direction!!
Cheers,
Zubin.
On 11/30/06, Andreas Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm proud to announce, that I finished writing the XML files for
autogenerating all UI* components + tags and all html components and
tags i
Aren't these 2 different threads? All Cagatay wants to do is promote the
component...
Then there was a thread just a few days ago about the commons-util, we
should continue that conversation there...
On 11/27/06, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, now I do not understand anything an
Ole,
Good stuff. Let me know if you need a hosting location, we can get that
sorted for you and get it out to the community en masse!
Zubin.
On 11/24/06, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> zip it and send it to my address, I'd like to take a look over the
weeknd!
Do we have a place
Nope, I got it too...On 11/3/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am I the only one getting these after I send a message to either the dev or users list?Dennis Byrne-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, November 3, 2006 11:43 AMTo: [EMAIL
Pallavi,IBM is aware of classloader conflicts with MyFaces on Websphere 5.x - please open a support ticket with them and they will likely have a history of resolutions for it. Cheers,Zubin.
On 11/2/06, Arash Rajaeeyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi roy,I am not sure but I think IBM has its own imple
Remy,I was just answering Craig's question. Alpha != Final.Cheers,Z.On 10/31/06, Remy Maucherat <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Zubin Wadia wrote:> It's not official...>
> http://tomcat.apache.org/download-60.cgiIt's official, but it's an alpha release, which to me is a lot betterthan a random build (it
It's not official...http://tomcat.apache.org/download-60.cgiOn 10/31/06, Wendy Smoak <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On 10/31/06, Craig McClanahan <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Didn't Tomcat 6.0 just go final? If so, it'd probably be worth updating to> the final version number.Not yet... 6.0.0 exists, b
Matthias,It was meant for Manfred, he just sent it to dev by mistake!Z.On 10/24/06, Matthias Wessendorf <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I think something went wrong here :)or at least we wanna ensure that every user can read (w/o to translate)
your mail.PS: Alle Apache Server waren down, wegen server-um
DoubleM,Have you left Gtalk on somewhere or r u ignoring me?Z.On 10/16/06, Martin Marinschek <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:By the way - in private communication with Geir, He's told me that
contacting Sun randomly is not appropriate. So if I'll contact Edagain, it won't be in his function as Sun repre
Martin,Just did a blind "reply-all" - not intentional.Cheers,Z.On 10/16/06, Martin Marinschek <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:No, not so far.We'll need for Geir to come up with news. And Zubin, please don't
include Ed in the cc for such questions.regards,MartinOn 10/16/06, Zub
Team(s),Any updates on the 1.2 TCK?Thanks,Zubin.On 10/6/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:This is utterly inappropriate. Please don't do that.Martin Marinschek wrote:
> That's good news! So we really need to get Sun up and moving...>> Ed, can you help us out?>> regards,>> Martin>> O
Yes. We will get there, promise.Zubin.On 10/5/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/5/06, Tim McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Hi, I see that there are a number of Jira's opened with JSR-252 as the> component. Does that mean there is a definitive (or even tentative) plan
> to implem
So the widget "builds" the clienttreee.-MOn 10/5/06, Zubin Wadia <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Right on. I think "drag and drop" node switching and editing should be part> of an AJAXized implementation of the Tree component as that model suits it
> better.>> Fo
you
don't want this "overhead" when just displaying structured data.I think same is true for an editable table(not a table w/ inputText in it... ;) )-MOn 10/5/06, Zubin Wadia <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Matthias,>> I think the Tree component can be used in contexts beyon
Matthias,I think the Tree component can be used in contexts beyond navigation - for example, it can be implemented for Content/Document management where a Category-DocumentType heirarchy needs to be user managed and editable based on their changing business process and the type of content they wish
Hi Arash,We'll be testing MyFaces 1.2 on Glassfish - that should be a suitable test-bed. You could join in on the March to 1.2 and submit some patches to JIRA if you'd like!
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&pid=10600&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=prio
Opportunities in the NY/NJ area - Interested Developers - please send your resume+rates to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or contact me on GTalk for details.Current positions are for "Senior GUI Developers" with competencies in JSF, Facelets, CSS, XHTML and _javascript_.
Cheers,Zubin.
Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/13/06, Zubin Wadia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Might as well throw my 2 cents in here - while more developers would help> the cause, the root cause of the conflict lies in the fact that one
> sub-project moved in a relatively non-aligne
Team,Might as well throw my 2 cents in here - while more developers would help the cause, the root cause of the conflict lies in the fact that one sub-project moved in a relatively non-aligned manner to the rest. This is what needs to change. I don't think making Tobago a top-level ASF project will
Would you like a medal Arash?On 9/2/06, Arash Rajaeeyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
don't worryI am in Iran (main part of axis of evil)we have access to all this crypto codedon't waste your time hiding them!
On 9/2/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apache MyFaces has bindings to the jav
48 matches
Mail list logo
