Team(s),Any updates on the 1.2 TCK?Thanks,Zubin.On 10/6/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:This is utterly inappropriate. Please don't do that.Martin Marinschek wrote:
> That's good news! So we really need to get Sun up and moving...>> Ed, can you help us out?>> regards,>> Martin>> O
Multiline Tab
-
Key: TOMAHAWK-742
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-742
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Tabbed Pane
Environment: all systems
Reporter:
I ran the TCK tests. 3 test cases failed. I will send the report
within the next hour.
On 10/14/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/13/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/13/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm on busineess/vacation in India right now
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1467?page=comments#action_12442459
]
Adam Winer commented on MYFACES-1467:
-
With regards to the original issue: the bug is *not* in UIInput, but is in
fact in the decode() implementation for t
I mean if an object(not List) is serializable saveAttachedState simply returns it so;values[1] = getValue() instanceof StateHolder ? saveAttachedState(context, getValue()) : getValue();doesn't matter because saveAttachedState(context, getValue()) and getValue() are same for Serializable.
Still I co
Sean, I see that Serializable is already supported in saveAttachedState. I couldn't get why it's failing in your case, can you give more details?CagatayOn 10/16/06,
Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Catagay this breaks my code. Serializable should also be supported.I have a bunch of Hiber
I just did two bulk changes to issues in Tomahawk.
Any issue that was marked 'Affects' 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT is now 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT.
Any issue that was marked 'Fix For' 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT is now 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT.
This was necessary because the 1.1.4 release branch was re-copied last
Wednesday, so things disc
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-491?page=all ]
sean schofield updated TOMAHAWK-491:
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Fix Version/s: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
Resolution: Fixed
I tested the fix and it works great! It al
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-738?page=all ]
sean schofield reopened TOMAHAWK-738:
-
Catagay this breaks my code. Serializable should also be supported. I have a
bunch of Hibernate domain objects that are serializable tha
Catagay this breaks my code. Serializable should also be supported.
I have a bunch of Hibernate domain objects that are serializable that
I use in a multi page table where I need save state. I'm going to
reopen the JIRA issue.
Sean
On 10/15/06, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes su
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-491?page=comments#action_12442440
]
sean schofield commented on TOMAHAWK-491:
-
m having a problemn passing a commandButton parameter inside of a t:column. I
wonder if this is due to the sa
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-491?page=comments#action_12442439
]
sean schofield commented on TOMAHAWK-491:
-
I'm having a problemn assing a commandButton parameter inside of a t:column. I
wonder if this is due to the
Yes sure, I'll apply the same to 1.1.4.CagatayOn 10/15/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Author: cagatay> Date: Sun Oct 15 03:36:01 2006> New Revision: 464151>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=464151
> Log:> Fix for
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-139?page=all ]
Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-139.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Apt Plugin should support fork mode
> ---
>
> Key: TOBAGO-139
> URL: htt
Continuum is failing right now I cannot check. If you check in the
code and compile it, everything runs fine. I guess that continuum is
trying to compile Impl with a wrong version of shared for the 1.2
build, but I cannot check that right now. Later this week I will have
a look at it.
Cheers,
Br
Yes, IMO that should be the numbering for MyFaces. I don't know when
there will be tomahawk component working only with version 1.2, but
then, the numbering will be tomahawk-1.2 (or maybe a different
component library for 1.2 components? there is not a decision on that
point yet).
A possible tomah
Bruno,
You might want to have this raised on the internal legal list if you want an
official answer.
--- Noel
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Aranda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 4:36
To: legal-discuss@apache.org
Cc: MyFaces Development
Subject: Use o
On 10/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Online report :
http://myfaces.zones.apache.org:8080/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/64/buildId/5275
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
This is the only failed build in Con
myfaces-core-src is missing some files available in the bin
---
Key: MYFACES-1468
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1468
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
Hi I am writing a guide for beginners on how to use MyFacesI have two questionsI want to know what will be package name for implementation of JSF 1.2 api on download siteis it going to be:
myfaces-core-1.2.x ?if so will tomahawk branched to to two different versions one for running on JSF 1.1 and a
>>future will bring us ... lets beat ruby - hehe - just kidding ;-)hey why not?
when the JSR 276 finished we can bring ease of use of Java Studio Creator to All java IDE's then users can just drag and drop their database tables or java bean or EJB intro JSF pages and have the application ready!
as
Hi!
Someone willing to extend our HtmlInputCalendar to allow to input a time?
Additional attributes like:
inputTime="true|false"
timePrecision="hours|minutes|seconds"
would be great!
"timePrecision" will define the pattern:
hours: HH
minutes: HH:MM
seconds: HH:MM:SS
The missing part should be i
Hi Arash!
> sorry for being impatient
hehe :-)
> I had an argument with a rubby developer about how java can be as easy
> as ruby and I saw your component at same day!
> I find it very useful for that argument.
Let's see how far we can go. For now I removed the persistence stuff,
the "master plan"
sorry for being impatient, I had an argument with a rubby developer about how java can be as easy as ruby and I saw your component at same day! I find it very useful for that argument.
On 10/15/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Arash!> hey Mario, these gui builder components are gr
Hi Arash!
> hey Mario, these gui builder components are great I think they may
> gain lots of attention
> is there any way I can read more about them?
Nope, there is only the source and a simple example yet.
If you checkout myfaces using the url [1] you'll get the sandbox15
module of tomahawk too.
On 10/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: cagatay
Date: Sun Oct 15 03:36:01 2006
New Revision: 464151
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=464151
Log:
Fix for TOMAHAWK-738
Does this need to be applied to the branch for 1.1.4?
Also... can you please include a
Hi Wendy!
>> I didn't add it to our main pom.xml file in tomahawk as
>> then it is a requirement to use Java 5.0 for the whole build, which
>> shouldn't be, should it?
>
> Profiles can be activated by JDK version. For example, from the Shale
> Apps pom:
Ah yes, great idea!
Works like a charm.
>>
On 10/15/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've finished setting up the sandbox15 stuff.
We now have working pom.xml things in there so that anyone who would
like to check out the stuff is able to do a simple "mvn install" in
there, though, I didn't add it to our main pom.xml file
hey Mario, these gui builder components are great I think they may gain lots of attentionis there any way I can read more about them?On 10/15/06, Mario Ivankovits (JIRA)
wrote:
create a component which creates the JSF tree based on beans and its annotations
Hi!
I've finished setting up the sandbox15 stuff.
We now have working pom.xml things in there so that anyone who would
like to check out the stuff is able to do a simple "mvn install" in
there, though, I didn't add it to our main pom.xml file in tomahawk as
then it is a requirement to use Java 5.
create a component which creates the JSF tree based on beans and its annotations
Key: TOMAHAWK-741
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-741
Project: MyFaces
create a component which creates the JSF tree based on beans and its annotations
Key: TOMAHAWK-740
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-740
Project: MyFaces
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-730?page=all ]
Mario Ivankovits resolved TOMAHAWK-730.
---
Fix Version/s: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
Resolution: Fixed
added to sandbox
> create a component which will submit a form on a specific event
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-157?page=all ]
Volker Weber resolved TOBAGO-157.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Resizing of browser window should result in recalculation of layout, even if
> the same view is rerendered
>
Resizing of browser window should result in recalculation of layout, even if
the same view is rerendered
Key: TOBAGO-157
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/br
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-738?page=all ]
Cagatay Civici resolved TOMAHAWK-738.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Now saveAttachedState is not used for non state holders
> SaveState fails with a java.util.List implementation other than ArrayLi
Yes Marting that's exactly the problem. After digging more, I've realized that we dont need to change anything in restoreState of the component because calling restoreAttachedState will simply return the value if it's not a special wrapped type.
public Object saveState(FacesContext context) {
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1467?page=comments#action_12442373
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-1467:
-
I pretty much think that the single value validation is a good thing. JSF is a
spec not a product.
so
38 matches
Mail list logo