Is "src/${scope}-${module}/${lang}" a considerable option?
This may preserve classic file layout back compatibility when the module
part is undefined.
Also it will be alphabetically sortable in the filesystem (inside of src/
dir).
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 7:40 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> I sti
I discovered a problem. If the maven command has a module filter (-pl), the
build hangs in the very beginning. This is a reproducible problem on a
private project (about 700 modules) and obviously related to switch from
3.9.9 to 3.9.10-SNAPSHOT.
The gist with stack traces:
https://gist.github.com/
3
> >
> > On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 6:57 PM Tamás Cservenák
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Seems related to this:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-8256
> > >
> > > Interestingly, this is not noticeable on master, we may have mi
Seems to be ok now 👍
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 7:37 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Sergey, I added another commit, you missed.
>
> T
>
> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 7:33 PM Sergey Chernov
> wrote:
> >
> > I built a commit from your fork and tried the build with filterin
Just tried the 4.0.0-rc-3 comparing with 3.9.9, it's 4x times slower (!) on
a project of ~900 modules (700 of them are jar).
Maven 3 builds it in 2m57s, while Maven 4 in 11m48s (reproducible, with all
m2 caches). No build cache solutions enabled to compare pure build time.
Project is nothing specia
nowski
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Snapshot build is avaliable at:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.9.10-SNAPSHOT/
>
> look up for the latest build
>
>
> śr., 21 maj 2025, 17:39 użytkownik Sergey Chernov
> napisał:
Thanks for asking, I planned to raise this topic soon in the mailing list
Here you can find a presentation board
https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVLYUPRas=/ which also has a 5 minute video
with explanation (click Play on the first slide, no auth is required).
Long story short: standard Maven builder
That's interesting. I can try to inspect this with a profiler to find "hot"
stack traces.
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 9:52 PM Martin Desruisseaux <
martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Le 2025-05-26 à 22 h 55, Sergey Chernov a écrit :
>
> > J
ing it against Maven 4’s
> concurrent builder to compare performance and compatibility? I’ll take
> a look at your code in the maven-turbo-builder subdirectory and try it
> out on a sample project.
>
> Thanks for sharing, and I’m excited to continue this discussion!
>
> Cheers,
It would be great to have 3.9.10-rc-1 available at
https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/ similar to
what is available for 4.0.0 versions. WDYT?
It’s much easier to use such dist instead of building own.
> On 20 May 2025, at 22:00, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
>
> I crea
No problems with latest 3.9.10-SNAPSHOT (1da6ce512) on the company projects.
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 5:43 PM Filipe Roque
wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-05-26 at 21:22 +0200, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> > dev distribution updated:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/maven/maven-3/3.9.10-SNAPS
phases runs when, or is that up to this plugin
to figure out?
Thank you very much for this question! It's addressed now (and also
mentioned in the readme), please try extension version 0.3 with the fix.
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 10:17 PM Sergey Chernov
wrote:
> Hey, Guillaume.
>
+1 tested on company projects
> On 1 Jun 2025, at 21:21, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We solved 36 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922&version=12355010
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> https://issues.apache.org/jir
/maven.config, mvnd still
uses the default "smart" builder. Is it by design or is it a bug?
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 2:32 PM Delany wrote:
> I can confirm the buildplan plugin indicates the correct order with v0.3.
> Thanks again!
> Delany
>
>
> On Thu, 29 May
+1
So far there are performance issues at scale of huge multi-module build,
see https://github.com/apache/maven/issues/2481
But the build itself looks correct and reproducible (in comparison with
Maven 3.x)
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:23 AM Cheng Pan wrote:
> Hi Maven community,
>
> I’m trying
I made a simple multi-module project generator which has some size
parameters.
Please see project description here
https://github.com/maven-turbo-reactor/maven-multiproject-generator
The good news is that it highlights the performance problem in comparison
between Maven3 and Maven4.
The generated
+1 (nb)
Checked for huge private codebase
On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 4:12 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2025, 00:10 Michael Osipov wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > NOTE: Expect this to be the *last* release on the 3.8.x line to close
> > off the branch.
> >
> > We solved 6 issues:
> >
gt; As the documentation says, the phases have been switched around.
> But can you make it work with the buildplan-maven-plugin:list-phases goal
> so I can actually see which phases runs when, or is that up to this plugin
> to figure out?
>
> Kind regards,
> Delany
>
>
> On
Guillaume, that's awesome. It's good that there is no rush with it.
Once I'll have insights, I'll share them.
Xeno, the project I'm checking is private unfortunately. Also this can be
quite challenging to find a good Maven multi-module project as a reference
for performance testing and compatibili
ext (attach-version) @
> >>>> jetty-ee10-bom ---
> >>>> [INFO]
> >>>> [INFO] --- resources:3.3.1:copy-resources (copy-resources) @
> >>>> jetty-ee10-bom ---
> >>>> [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory
> >>>>
> /home/x
3 and Maven 4
> "drifted" apart so much that the "simple backport" is not enough, and
> Maven 3 needs more, much more.
>
>
> Thanks
> T
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 12:07 PM Sergey Chernov
> wrote:
> >
> > I forgot to mention, that if thi
I forgot to mention, that if this commit is reverted
https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/45201347c4 the problem is gone. So it’s
obviously related.
> On 9 Jul 2025, at 12:05, Sergey Chernov wrote:
>
> https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/45201347c4
-1 (nb)
I’ve discovered an issue with module subset running (when we specify “-pl” with
multiple modules) and running CLI style “surefire:test” instead of phase style).
So my command looks like “mvn surefire:test -pl
:module1,:module2,:module3,:module4"
The problem appears since this commit
h
am a bit confused: what did you test then?
> Or you say that binaries staged by Slawek are affected?
>
> Thanks
> T
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 2:19 PM Sergey Chernov
> wrote:
> >
> > Just checked the latest master of Maven4 (66e96ffcbeec9), the problem is
&
+1 :)
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 2:53 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> I think not, Sergey?
>
> T
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 2:41 PM Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm confused, does the -1 still stand?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 202
+1 (nb)
On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 10:07 PM Matthias Bünger
wrote:
> +1 (nb)
>
> Am 12.07.2025 um 20:58 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 14 issues:
> > https://github.com/apache/maven/issues?q=milestone%3A3.9.11
> >
> > Changes since the last release:
> > https://github.com/ap
Nice feature!
I see it's possible to specify vendor, version or direct distribution URL.
Is it possible to use an internal corporate registry (like Nexus or
Artifactory) with JDK distributions supporting multiple platforms and CPU
arch?
How to configure this?
On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 8:46 PM Guill
27 matches
Mail list logo
