Re: [jira] Created: (MJAR-42) Add LICENCE and NOTICE files to the jar

sues but I don't see how we can completely switch geronimo to m2 without this. thanks david jencks Thanks -- Jeremy Jeremy Boynes (JIRA) wrote: Add LICENCE and NOTICE files to the jar --- Key: MJAR-42 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org

Please don't deploy broken poms for new xmlbeans release 2.2

situation occurring for the new xmlbeans release. I'll try to come up with something correct in the next few days but meanwhile I'd like to know what can be done to prevent broken poms from being deployed, especially for this particular case.

Building and using a plugin in the same build (m2)

maven really to force any such project to split the build up into at least two phases, the first where the stuff the plugin uses is built + the plugin, the second the stuff that uses the plugin? To me this seems like close to a showstopper for using maven. thanks david jencks

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

m an unknown source, is wrong, did not come from the project, and can't be updated. Much as I like maven it's hard for me to see how this is going to lead to success. thanks david jencks It also may seem ideal to have projects take care of their own POMs, but it makes it frustratin

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

On Jul 4, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 5/07/2006 10:54 AM, David Jencks wrote: I think the process is somewhat broken and that the maven team is being far too strict about changing broken poms that were in fact installed by the maven team, not supplied by the project

Re: MNG-2571 - weird exception using the embedder

en.plugin.ear.EarModule] So what am I missing? How come that 'isInstance' method from the Class object could return different results? The classes are in different classloaders. Hopefully the classloaders' toString() will give you enough info about which ones they are if you a

[M1] Plugin hell, help desperately needed

cache and the other plugins are not getting reloaded. Can anyone suggest a way to produce a reliable build with the current plugin releases? We might be able to restrict ourselves to 1.1-b2. Will the proposed 1.7 plugin-plugin release help with this problem? thanks da

proposed rar plugin

commit a version in some other project that will be using it (such as geronimo or openejb)? thanks david jencks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Automatic download of resources not found in ibiblio

e url tag for purposes of automated download would break its current function of letting people answer the question, "What does this do, anyway?" I fear that adding a second way to obtain artifacts will result in wholesale confusion. than

Re: Maven 1.0 & plugin releases

Is there any chance of getting the rar plugin I submitted in before the 1.0 release? http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1301 thanks david jencks On Saturday, June 12, 2004, at 09:37 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Hi all, I anticipate being ready to vote for Maven 1.0 within a week now, and need to

Re: maven.gen.src added to maven?

nerated-sources/xdoclet/java /target/generated-sources/xdoclet/ejb thanks david jencks and they would each be a source folder in Eclipse. Works great. However, because maven.gen.src is defined in the Eclipse plugin only, you have to specify for the hibernate and xdoclet plugins the full path to

Re: plugin release managers/lead developers

Although Dion very kindly committed the original rar plugin, since you wish to be lead of all the other j2ee artifact generating plugins, it might make sense for you to take that one as well. BTW all suggestions for improvements would be welcome:-) thanks david jencks On Friday, July 23, 2004

Re: Multiple dependencies with the same id but different types

If no one can actually fix your problem, you can always build the adapter jar in one project and package it into the rar in another, with slightly different names. I would definitely prefer that someone figure out how to have multiple dependencies such as you ask for. thanks david jencks On

Re: Adding sourcepath to Eclipse plugin..

l project, and links dependencies that are not in the multiproject build as jar dependencies in the repo. Does the eclipse plugin do this? Is this related to this discussion? thanks david jencks On Sep 24, 2004, at 8:10 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: Eric Pugh wrote on Friday, September 24, 2004 4:07 PM:

Re: [idea plugin] trying to muck with plugin to use antlr sources

dds target/xmlbeans to the idea sources. This is similar to what the eclipse plugin does. See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIDEA-10 thanks david jencks On Sep 24, 2004, at 1:08 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: Hiya, I've been playing with the idea plugin to see if I can get it to include the antlr

problem with jellybean not getting properties set

its value with Build and Project and working downwards, but get the same result. What can cause this behavior? thanks david jencks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: problem with jellybean not getting properties set

classloading difficulties for multiple plugin versions in 1.0.2 thanks david jencks On Jul 10, 2005, at 11:56 AM, David Jencks wrote: I'm working with a jelly bean in a plugin in maven 1.0.2. It has a property I am setting thusly in plugin.jelly: reso

Re: Anyone knows of an existing J2EE/EJB open source application?

Hogstrom: matt at hogstrom.org I think the build is mavenized, but I'm not sure. thanks david jencks On Aug 23, 2005, at 2:52 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: -Original Message- From: Thomas Van de Velde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mardi 23 août 2005 11:46 To: Maven Developers

Re: Releasing issues

OS9 supports 1.1 at most. It certainly never got close to 1.3. I don't think you can use that as an argument against requiring 1.4 :-) david jencks On May 1, 2005, at 1:37 PM, Thomas Van de Velde wrote: I think Mac OS9 only supports jdk 1.3 but I guess nobody is using that. Thomas On 5

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Require Java 21 for Maven 4 (Rephrased Vote)

results are obvious, and are the pro or anti java 21 folks starting the haggling? thanks David Jencks > On May 23, 2025, at 1:05 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > There is an interesting parallel here with the what is happening in the > logo-dev mailing list: Someone calls for a vote, the

[jira] Created: (MEV-196) ObjectWeb HOWL pom

ObjectWeb HOWL pom -- Key: MEV-196 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-196 Project: Maven Evangelism Type: Task Components: Missing POM Reporter: David Jencks This is a valid m2 pom that is checked into the howl repo. However, AFAICT

[jira] Updated: (MEV-196) ObjectWeb HOWL pom

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-196?page=all ] David Jencks updated MEV-196: - Attachment: pom.xml This is the actual pom rather than a diff, since it is a new file. > ObjectWeb HOWL pom > -- > > Key: MEV-196 &g

[jira] Commented: (MAVEN-1634) Attempt to build geronimo with Maven 1.1 beta 1 results in "MavenException: Unknown error reading project" & XmlPullParserException

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1634?page=comments#action_41996 ] David Jencks commented on MAVEN-1634: - I fixed the backtick and some syntax errors in several project.xml's Now I'

[jira] Commented: (MNG-581) Add target/classes director to compiler:compile classpath

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-581?page=comments#action_42733 ] David Jencks commented on MNG-581: -- Just including the generated classes in target/classes seems to be adequate for m1. I think a fix for this is needed in m2. To me asking xmlbeans

[jira] Commented: (MEV-48) openejb poms

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-48?page=comments#action_43741 ] David Jencks commented on MEV-48: - These are antique milestone releases that we aren't planning to ever look at again. G1M4 should be out in a day or two and it uses a different w

[jira] Commented: (MNG-699) Add EJB3 support in a plugin

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-699?page=comments#action_45803 ] David Jencks commented on MNG-699: -- I have no particular opinion on the idea of allowing you to change the extension of the artifact generated by the jar plugin, but would like to point

[jira] Commented: (MEV-8) Upload Sun POMs for non redistributable jars

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-8?page=comments#action_39773 ] David Jencks commented on MEV-8: Since there are non-sun freely available implementations of many of these specs I would prefer to see the provenance (Sun) for these particular

<    1   2