Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Dependency Analyzer version 1.16.0

2025-04-14 Thread Matthias Bünger
+1 nb Am 14.04.2025 um 18:26 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski: Hi, We solved 7 issues: https://github.com/apache/maven-dependency-analyzer/milestone/1?closed=1 There are no issues left in GitHub: https://github.com/apache/maven-dependency-analyzer/issues There are still a couple of issues left in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Dependency Analyzer version 1.16.0

2025-04-14 Thread Jermaine Hua
+1 Slawomir Jaranowski 于2025年4月15日 周二00:26写道: > Hi, > > We solved 7 issues: > https://github.com/apache/maven-dependency-analyzer/milestone/1?closed=1 > > There are no issues left in GitHub: > https://github.com/apache/maven-dependency-analyzer/issues > > There are still a couple of issues left i

Status of JPMS support and "module-info-patch" proposal

2025-04-14 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello all The compiler plugin has a pull request which is ready for the support of multi-release projects and modular projects defined by the elements introduced in POM 4.1.0. However, the changes are a bit large and I'm not sure how to proceed for review, as it would be a lot of work for re

Re: Status of JPMS support and "module-info-patch" proposal

2025-04-14 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello Romain Le 2025-04-14 à 14 h 28, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : (…snip…) Doesn't it sound better than a file which looks like a java thing but is not (content), has no editor support (extension), will need to be supported by all plugins and still requires its location to be configurable sin

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Dependency Analyzer version 1.16.0

2025-04-14 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
Hi, We solved 7 issues: https://github.com/apache/maven-dependency-analyzer/milestone/1?closed=1 There are no issues left in GitHub: https://github.com/apache/maven-dependency-analyzer/issues There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven File Management API version 3.2.0

2025-04-14 Thread Jermaine Hua
+1 Matthias Bünger 于2025年4月14日 周一22:25写道: > +1 nb > > Am 13.04.2025 um 23:27 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski: > > Hi, > > > > We solved 28 issues: > > https://github.com/apache/maven-file-management/milestone/1?closed=1 > > > > > > There are no issues left in GitHub: > > https://github.com/apache/mave

Re: Status of JPMS support and "module-info-patch" proposal

2025-04-14 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le lun. 14 avr. 2025 à 15:03, Martin Desruisseaux < martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> a écrit : > Hello Romain > > Le 2025-04-14 à 14 h 28, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > > (…snip…) > > > > Doesn't it sound better than a file which looks like a java thing but is > > not (content), has no editor

Re: Status of JPMS support and "module-info-patch" proposal

2025-04-14 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Le 2025-04-14 à 17 h 36, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : white/black box tests (or whatever name you use today) are a good example which show you need at least two files exactly as today ("without jpms") you play with surefire execution. The proposed `module-info-patch` is for whitebox testing on

Re: Status of JPMS support and "module-info-patch" proposal

2025-04-14 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le lun. 14 avr. 2025 à 18:57, Martin Desruisseaux < martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> a écrit : > Le 2025-04-14 à 17 h 36, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > > white/black box tests (or whatever name you use today) are a good example > > which show you need at least two files exactly as today ("with

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven File Management API version 3.2.0

2025-04-14 Thread Sylwester Lachiewicz
+1 niedz., 13 kwi 2025, 23:28 użytkownik Slawomir Jaranowski < s.jaranow...@gmail.com> napisał: > Hi, > > We solved 28 issues: > https://github.com/apache/maven-file-management/milestone/1?closed=1 > > > There are no issues left in GitHub: > https://github.com/apache/maven-file-management/issues

Re: Status of JPMS support and "module-info-patch" proposal

2025-04-14 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi, maybe a bit out of context but some work was done to make it possible to define options within the pom, why wouldn't it fit better than a hacky file which is actually just an internal trick of some maven plugins but not all? It would be like dependencies for a JVM. Assuming to assign them a "s

Re: Status of JPMS support and "module-info-patch" proposal

2025-04-14 Thread Gary Gregory
"The ".txt" extension is because this file is not standard Java (proposals for better extension are welcome)." How about ".mvn" or ".maven" to make it clear that this file exists for Maven's purpose and is not documentation, which is what ".txt" feels like to me. Gary On Mon, Apr 14, 2025, 05:4

Re: Status of JPMS support and "module-info-patch" proposal

2025-04-14 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Le 2025-04-14 à 12 h 49, Gary Gregory a écrit : "The ".txt" extension is because this file is not standard Java (proposals for better extension are welcome)." How about ".mvn" or ".maven" to make it clear that this file exists for Maven's purpose and is not documentation, which is what ".txt"

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven File Management API version 3.2.0

2025-04-14 Thread Matthias Bünger
+1 nb Am 13.04.2025 um 23:27 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski: Hi, We solved 28 issues: https://github.com/apache/maven-file-management/milestone/1?closed=1 There are no issues left in GitHub: https://github.com/apache/maven-file-management/issues There is 1 issue left in JIRA: https://issues.ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Dependency Analyzer version 1.16.0

2025-04-14 Thread Sylwester Lachiewicz
+1 wt., 15 kwi 2025, 06:17 użytkownik Matthias Bünger napisał: > +1 nb > > Am 14.04.2025 um 18:26 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski: > > Hi, > > > > We solved 7 issues: > > https://github.com/apache/maven-dependency-analyzer/milestone/1?closed=1 > > > > There are no issues left in GitHub: > > https://

Re: Status of JPMS support and "module-info-patch" proposal

2025-04-14 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le mar. 15 avr. 2025 à 01:10, Martin Desruisseaux < martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> a écrit : > Le 2025-04-14 à 19 h 43, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > > This is not always true, the common case is to inject a mock of an > external > > service to test an algorithm or alike. > > If the service

Re: Status of JPMS support and "module-info-patch" proposal

2025-04-14 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Le 2025-04-14 à 19 h 43, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : This is not always true, the common case is to inject a mock of an external service to test an algorithm or alike. If the service is a public interface, there is no need to patch a module for creating mocks. I'd like all the JPMS to st