[VOTE] Release Maven Fluido Skin version 2.0.0

Hi, we solved 46 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317926&version=12354045 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MSKINS%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%20%

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Javadoc Plugin version 3.11.1

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1: Herve Boutemy, Tamás Cservenák, Arnaud Héritier PMC quorum: reached I will promote the artifacts to the central repo, the source release ZIP file and add this release the board report. ---

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 3.5.2

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1: Matthias Bünger, Tamás Cservenák, Michael Osipov, Herve Boutemy PMC quorum: reached I will promote the artifacts to the central repo, the source release ZIP file and add this release the board report.

[ANN] Maven Surefire 3.5.2 released

The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Surefire version 3.5.2. https://maven.apache.org/surefire/ Release Notes - Maven Surefire - Version 3.5.2 ** Bug * [SUREFIRE-2276] - JUnit5's TestTemplate failures treated as flakes with retries * [SUREFIRE-2277] -

[ANN] Maven Javadoc Plugin 3.11.1 released

The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Javadoc Plugin, version 3.11.1. This module generates browsable HTML pages from Java source code. https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin/ You should specify the version in your project's plugin configuration:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 3.5.2

Am 2024-10-30 um 13:20 schrieb Michael Osipov: Hi, we solved 6 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? projectId=12317927&version=12355213 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/? jql=project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20res

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Fluido Skin version 2.0.0

Looks like generated site still has references to use tags in site.xml. Also missing information in migration-guide about significant changes like need to use new site plugin (like in previous versions). IMHO all site.xml (not only samples) should be migrated to new syntax. -1 Br Sylwester sob.