-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Comments inline.
- -john
Brett Porter wrote:
|
| Hi,
|
| I was looking over Emmanuel's Continuum release marathon today and
| wondered if there were a couple of things we could do to improve the
| process.
|
| Two things stood out for me - maybe Emm
I've done a lot of release today for use the same groupId in plexus deps
(org.codehaus.plexus). This strategy avoided me managing a great number of exclusions in
continuum dependencies. I thought one of these depdencency wasn't release since the
groupId change in all plexus components.
Perhaps
Jason van Zyl wrote:
If the production of a JAR was in fact unchanged then I agree that it
should not be release again. If that's the case then it would be a best
practice to document this but you can't rely on this as sometimes people
just won't document things. What if the md5sum for the last r
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 09:05 -0700, Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking over Emmanuel's Continuum release marathon today and
> wondered if there were a couple of things we could do to improve the
> process.
>
> Two things stood out for me - maybe Emmanuel can highlight the reasons
> the
Hi,
I was looking over Emmanuel's Continuum release marathon today and
wondered if there were a couple of things we could do to improve the
process.
Two things stood out for me - maybe Emmanuel can highlight the reasons
they were necessary and we can come up with some solutions.
1) It app
