AW: the simplest possible maven plugin, sort of

2012-09-11 Thread christofer.d...@c-ware.de
pdates the plugin in my repo and from then on the updated plugin is used. So I think you are all right. Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. September 2012 12:17 An: Maven Developers List Betreff: Re: the simplest poss

Re: the simplest possible maven plugin, sort of

2012-09-11 Thread Benson Margulies
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Anders Hammar wrote: > Switch to Maven 3 and this should work. Try it and report back! I did and it did. > > /Anders > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:22 PM, David Jencks wrote: >> Our experience in geronimo has always been that maven does not support this, >> and

Re: the simplest possible maven plugin, sort of

2012-09-11 Thread Anders Hammar
Switch to Maven 3 and this should work. Try it and report back! /Anders On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:22 PM, David Jencks wrote: > Our experience in geronimo has always been that maven does not support this, > and I thought for maven 3 it was announced that it never ever would. > > We have a profl

Re: the simplest possible maven plugin, sort of

2012-09-10 Thread David Jencks
Our experience in geronimo has always been that maven does not support this, and I thought for maven 3 it was announced that it never ever would. We have a proflie to build up through the plugin, then you can do the full build. Releasing is a pain as you have to do the manual profile build with

Re: the simplest possible maven plugin, sort of

2012-09-10 Thread Daniel Kulp
Interesting… I wonder how I've managed to do CXF releases for all these years then. :-) Seriously, for CXF <=2.5.x, I use Maven 2.2.1 and it "just works". Parts of the build certainly do use the plugins that are built as part of the reactor. That said, we use "install" as the default targe

Re: the simplest possible maven plugin, sort of

2012-09-10 Thread Anders Hammar
I'm fairly sure this didn't work in Maven 2.x. It was one of the unsolvable Maven 2.x bugs which was fixed in Maven 3. The workaround would be to use an older released version of the plugin. Don't think running a build twice is/was a workable workaround as I can't see how that would work in a relea

Re: the simplest possible maven plugin, sort of

2012-09-10 Thread Arnaud Héritier
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > > On Sep 10, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Benson Margulies > wrote: > > > >> In Maven 2.x, the following was true; the reactor could not apply a > >> plugin it had just built. So, if a par

Re: the simplest possible maven plugin, sort of

2012-09-10 Thread Benson Margulies
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > On Sep 10, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> In Maven 2.x, the following was true; the reactor could not apply a >> plugin it had just built. So, if a particular problem required a >> plugin (e.g., for generating code), the pl

Re: the simplest possible maven plugin, sort of

2012-09-10 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Sep 10, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > In Maven 2.x, the following was true; the reactor could not apply a > plugin it had just built. So, if a particular problem required a > plugin (e.g., for generating code), the plugin has to be an > independent project that is built in adva

the simplest possible maven plugin, sort of

2012-09-10 Thread Benson Margulies
In Maven 2.x, the following was true; the reactor could not apply a plugin it had just built. So, if a particular problem required a plugin (e.g., for generating code), the plugin has to be an independent project that is built in advance. Is this still true in 3.x? On a related front, have any rea