t you should imo be able to edit that page.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Mon, 7/18/11, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
>
>> From: Arnaud Héritier
>> Subject: Re: the pom compatibility threads
>> To: "Maven Developers List"
>> Date: Monday, July 18
humm, it tells me that there are no restrictions setup for that very page. So
once you have an account you should imo be able to edit that page.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 7/18/11, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> From: Arnaud Héritier
> Subject: Re: the pom compatibility threads
> T
You can, but I don't know at all we setup such rights :-)
Even PMCs aren't admin of the space.
I don't know how it is setup but I would hope that pmc group in ldap was
admin and dev group users of this space.
Brett, others ?
Any ideas of the process to give access to Benson.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 a
I don't seem to have karma for
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposals?showChildren=true#children.
Can I?
2011/7/17 Arnaud Héritier :
> For me the first thing is to push some ideas in the wiki and make them
> challenged by developpers
> I'm not so sure that there is a consensus
OK, I'm willing to write what I think I understood.
2011/7/17 Arnaud Héritier :
> For me the first thing is to push some ideas in the wiki and make them
> challenged by developpers
> I'm not so sure that there is a consensus and a real proposal to solve that
> upgrade taking care of all use cases
For me the first thing is to push some ideas in the wiki and make them
challenged by developpers
I'm not so sure that there is a consensus and a real proposal to solve that
upgrade taking care of all use cases (previous/future versions of maven,
transitive dependencies, depMgt import, inheritence .
Many threads lead back to the recent discussion, and all of its
predecessors, about preparing for a new version of the pom by allowing
for backwards compatibility.
How do we start this? There seemed a consensus on the design. Do we
need some branches of things?
---
