only maven-scm-provider-svnjava
--
Olivier
2009/3/20 Jason van Zyl :
> That's an old fork of svnkit, not sure you want to put it there. That
> project is essentially dead.
>
> On 20-Mar-09, at 1:46 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Not in mojo but here : http://xircles.codehaus.org/projects/svn
That's an old fork of svnkit, not sure you want to put it there. That
project is essentially dead.
On 20-Mar-09, at 1:46 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
Not in mojo but here : http://xircles.codehaus.org/projects/svn4j ?
a new path : https://svn.codehaus.org/svn4j/maven-scm-provider-
svnjava/
Hi,
Not in mojo but here : http://xircles.codehaus.org/projects/svn4j ?
a new path : https://svn.codehaus.org/svn4j/maven-scm-provider-svnjava/
--
Olivier
2009/3/20 Brett Porter :
>
> On 20/03/2009, at 2:17 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> So the Brett proposal looks fine too.
>> I can mark the svn
So the Brett proposal looks fine too.
I can mark the svnjava provider as optionnal and explain why on the
scm site and explain how to use it.
--
Olivier
2009/3/19 Jason van Zyl :
> From my experience asking anyone about anything legal has never been
> resolved in any timely manner.
>
> Whether gra
From my experience asking anyone about anything legal has never been
resolved in any timely manner.
Whether grand fathered or anything else. Discussions have gone on for
a very long time.
Olivier if you want to release it then I would just taking it to mojo
and then there are no issues.
On 19-Mar-09, at 1:25 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
Ok. It's was not really clear for me.
Technically we are not redistributing anything and we can ask the
board for clarification because in the strictest sense we do not
redistribute. But I think folks here would interpret a dependency in
Hi,
Ok. It's was not really clear for me.
Thanks for clarification,
--
Olivier
2009/3/19 Jason van Zyl :
> If the license is not one that the ASF accepts then we can't really dodge
> the issue by saying that it's only in the POM.
>
> On 18-Mar-09, at 5:22 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> As we
