Re: svn commit: r745955

2009-02-24 Thread Brett Porter
Sorry John, I sent a response before I went to sleep but when I came back found it hadn't gone through. The solution you put in place was right, it needs to set it regardless. I see you updated the IT too. Thanks! - Brett On 25/02/2009, at 1:22 AM, John Casey wrote: I'm still hopeful that

Re: svn commit: r745955

2009-02-24 Thread John Casey
I'm still hopeful that I can get the rewriting problems fixed. I don't really understand the details of what you're saying here, though. If the artifact has no file, and it's packaging == "pom", why is it a bad idea to set the POM as the artifact's file? I'll read up on that MCOMPILER issue t

Re: svn commit: r745955

2009-02-24 Thread Brett Porter
Hi John, I found another problem here: On 20/02/2009, at 5:39 AM, jdca...@apache.org wrote: Author: jdcasey Date: Thu Feb 19 18:39:09 2009 New Revision: 745955 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=745955&view=rev Log: [MNG-3057] Interpolate versions in POMs before installing/deploying them